Three new reports on the way cost of living is impacting students paint a grim picture of lost opportunities. Jim Dickinson urges another push on reducing costs
This article is more than 3 years old

Last summer, when we originally crowdsourced and published 101 ways to get the cost of living down for students, it rapidly became one of the most read articles on the site of all time.
That was heartening - and optimistically overestimating our influence, I assumed that universities would instigate working groups, tsars and taskforces to work on both short-term and long solutions to what is obviously going to be a long and hard period of student poverty.
There are a handful that have done that - extending their efforts beyond the fixes announced last autumn into impressive programmes of work aimed at reducing participation costs and monitoring and analysing the differential impacts of the crisis on different types of student.
But in a lot of cases those meetings have fallen out of the diary, the efficacy research is absent, and whatever quick fixes were put in place last time (often because everyone else had announced a quick fix and it started to look bad not to have one) have been reduced or reheated in one of the campus microwaves that were hastily installed.
As such much of the sector seems to have defaulted to that that thing it always does - pointing (reasonably) at governments for not doing enough while trumpeting moderate and sporadic catering discounts, inaccessible hardship funds and bursary packages that largely haven’t changed since they were drafted for the 2019 APP draft deadline.
The key “tell” has been asking SUs all summer who’s on their university’s working group on Cost of Living - only to find that there isn’t one. This happens a lot, of course. A disaster strikes, a fix is applied, and then we move onto the next crisis. And to be fair, they seem to appear more often these days.
But not only is the crisis still on, it’s getting worse. We are now well beyond the idea that HE is affordable on the money available from statutory sources. And while there’s a strong argument to be made about the role of governments in worsening the crisis, there’s still plenty that universities can do - especially on a whole provider basis (ie it’s everyone’s problem) - to play their part in alleviating some of its impacts.
Key to all of it is understanding how having no money impacts students’ ability to participate meaningfully in the experience they were sold and have enrolled into - and three new bits of research help a lot.
The National Student Money Survey from Save the Student isn’t the world’s most methodologically sound bit of polling we’ve come across - especially when, like the NatWest Student Living Index, it attempts to take its unweighted 1,786 respondent sample and make it mean something at regional level.
But if anything, methodological concerns highlight the need for the sector to collaborate on something better - or at least pressure the Department for Education (and the Welsh Government) to publish the Student Income and Expenditure survey results that it’s sat on (and cause the Scottish Government to commission its own).
It finds that the average student's monthly living costs have increased by 17 per cent, up from £924 to £1,078. 18 per cent of students in the survey have used a food bank in the last academic year, 64 per cent said they often or sometimes skip meals to save money, and while the proportion of surveyed students who have received hardship funding from their university has nearly doubled, the average amount received per student has gone down - from £1,026 to £905.
But it’s the qual that really drives it home:
The stress of worrying about money makes me want to cry. How I passed my first year I don't know but I [did] not have the energy to focus on doing financial plans and worked hard to get money as well as studying. I have the motivation in me but it is so hard and degrading going into university and constantly being told to get this book and these resources for my course and I'm worrying about [what] I'm going to eat tonight.
As such a new report from student finance and budgeting experts Blackbullion is arguably more helpful, insofar as it’s based on “confessions” that students have posted online about money worries and financial hardship.
The campaign it runs on instagram gives students the opportunity to see that they’re not alone if they’re struggling, discover places they can go for help and learn from both the not-so-good times and personal finance successes of their peers.
And this year’s responses paint both an important picture of how the crisis is impacting students’ ability to derive value from their experience, and identifies issues unlikely to be picked up by most surveys.
For example, a new trend was students selling or pawning high-value items just to cover the bare necessities:
Even though being “thrifty” is a skill to encourage in a sustainable economy, it is worrying if students are resorting to selling high-value items, like laptops and headsets, which could prove valuable to their studies, just to cover the basics, like food and bills.
That’s the sort of finding that might cause a university to redouble its efforts on lending schemes for key bits of tech.
Less unexpectedly is an intensification of a process where prices seem to be forcing many students into a choice between being frugal and missing out on different areas of student life. For some, this means missing social events that build belonging - for others it could mean struggling to pay for food.
That’s the sort of finding that might cause a university to work with its SU to not have to depend on sales from events wristbands to fund the course rep coordinator, or create facilities that allow food preparation as well as food reheating.
Multiple students reported feeling the squeeze of rising travel costs, and as well as avoiding Ubers to get home safely, they’re skipping paying bus fares or booking train tickets while living further away.
That’s the sort of finding that might cause a cost of living group to interrogate the journeys that students are making and identify ways to get the costs down by sharing costs or commissioning alternative solutions.
A rise in reporting being the victim of a scam might cause a whole provider approach to warning students about said scams. And a rise in commercial debt take up might cause a university to consider working with partners to offer or extend a lower cost way of borrowing the cash for the essentials. And so on.
Last year the Office for National Statistics (ONS) got involved too, publishing two lots of findings from its Student Cost of Living Insights Study (SCoLIS) in England. A run on from its Covid work with students in previous years, there were plenty of numbers on the behaviours, plans, opinions and wellbeing of higher education students in the context of the increases in cost-of-living - but not a lot on why, and what might be done.
Now helpfully it’s published the results of 25 semi-structured interviews with students in May on the impact of the increased cost of living in England - and the results are both stark and insightful - although none of it’s a surprise. (There’s also Quality and Methodology Information on the exercise on the ONS site)
I would have loved after this to go for [a] master's, but I don't think it will be possible. My career ambitions are something that looks completely impossible, and only exacerbated by the cost of living crisis.
ONS found students cutting down on food and other essentials, using savings or taking on debt. Some students had to work extra hours, sometimes in multiple jobs, or relied on support from family. Some were unable to afford course materials, affecting their ability to attend lectures or afford course materials. Some students studied online rather than attending lectures or seminars in person for at least part of the time - not because they wanted to, but to reduce transport and food costs - because they needed to.
Some days I really don't eat at all. When it was really cold, instead of putting the heating on I just [went] to the library...that I knew was hot, just to stay there.
Some moved to cheaper accommodation further from campus to save money, increasing their travel costs. Many reported that they had cut back on parts of their course that involved additional costs or had found ways to manage without some resources. Some felt that this was affecting their skills development - and inevitably the value they were getting from their course.
I feel like having those resources would have helped me write better essays, enriched my understanding of the materials I was studying. And that sometimes feels like a lost opportunity. Previously, when we've been going in five days a week, I'm making leaps and bounds with software because I can speak to my peers and I can get advice and support from them, whereas that’s completely gone.
It also affected their health and well-being. Some were unable to afford good food or had to cut back on other essentials, which affected their physical and mental health. Some students reported feeling stressed or anxious about their financial situation, hitting their ability to focus on studies.
I've noticed that my mum is working more hours than she previously would have done...that's partially because of the cost of living and partially to make sure I can fall back on them if I need to. I hate it. I have an older brother and sister who went to university and neither of them needed help.
And naturally that all had a knock on on social lives and networking opportunities - students were unable to afford to attend course-related events or social activities, which affected their ability to meet new people and build relationships with peers and lecturers - the essential belonging thing.
When you're in a university environment, so much of it is having a social experience with your peers. [That's] something I've missed out on because I can't afford it. It's been a little bit isolating and depressing in the sense of [feeling] ostracised. I'm opting to not do things socially and that's obviously having a knock-on effect on my mental health.
So much of the material puts governments firmly in the dock, insofar as it’s supposed to be their job to ensure students have the resources to benefit from what it is their university offers. But we are where we are - and it also points to things the sector could do to make at least a bit of a difference.
One interesting bit of feedback that I’ve had from many on last year’s long listicle is the tendency for discussions on the issue to end up riding around on hobby horses. As I said at the time:
I’ll be the first to agree that some senior salaries are out of kilter, or that there’s too many shiny buildings or whatever. But this kind of political point-scoring won’t help students in the year ahead. It’s comforting blaming marketisation, or the government, or Brexit, or Covid or whatever, but it doesn’t pay the gas bill.
Folk have also argued that the problem is that resource - in the form of time or money - just hasn’t been made available. On that, I still think this:
Some things that we’ve become proud of might need to go. If a “Fibchester University 100” student engagement project costing £60k could be closed in favour of a food bank, let’s do it. If the biscuits in the meetings can be replaced with some free breakfasts for the poorest students, it’s time. If employing more students as baristas in the coffee bar or data processors in registry means compromising on service standards – so be it. Students need the money.
I’ve also been told that when it comes to those access or APP meetings that people have, there’s a regulation-mandfated tendency to be very wary about financial support:
From the perspective of widening access, it might be time to shift resource from outreach to financial support. Of course those with departments and teams and projects are going to find ways to demonstrate that the former “works”. And yes I know that OfS is demanding you look in the rear view mirror with a ruler. But is there anything worse than spending the money getting them in only to resolve to then not support them to get on?
And while I do think it’s necessary to reduce the number of visits we ask a student to make to a campus, I’m not convinced that doing so should be the centrepiece of any approach:
I’ve been suspicious all year of the suggestion that you make campuses more accessible by facilitating students not to come to them. But more than that, I’m struck by (former SU officer) Martin Lewis arguing that this winter, we may need “warm banks” (the equivalent of “food banks”) where people who can’t afford heating are invited to spend their days at no cost with heating.
Or, put another way:
In what world should 1,000 commuter students on the edge of your area all be trying to heat their otherwise empty family homes during the day this winter? And for students in HMOs, remember they’ll either be trying to afford the bills themselves, or will have a landlord controlling their “all inclusive” bills by turning down the temperature via an app sat in a Costa counting their pension pot. We ought to be bussing them in to sit somewhere communal and warm – not leaving them out on their own watching their breath as they type out an assignment in gloves.
Anyway, in an attempt at kicking the tyres on the conversation for this coming year, below is the 101 suggestions again. Some are easier than others - but if the central unifying objective for everyone in HE right now is to reduce the costs of participation in higher education, they ought to represent a set of ideas that trigger 101 more.
Richard Mills | Comment | 24/09/26
New comments will come back with sign-in later this year.
Charlotte Smith · 7 Sept 2023
I think it’s unfair to blanket hardship funds as ‘inaccessible.’ As a hardship funds assessor we do everything we can to both promote our service and encourage students to apply, and given the number I assess I challenge this ‘inaccessible’ statement vehemently! This is surely giving out the message that there is no point applying to these funds as they are impossible to access and this is simply not true (at least here at Portsmouth)
Michael · 12 Sept 2023
The suggestions are valid and interesting. I would like universities to effectively lobby governments so that international students are free to do any job they wish instead of the usual restrictions which only help to limit their entrepreneurial prowess. Sometimes it’s very difficult for students to get part time jobs as the employers only want full time workers. Hence it is vital to work with companies to ensure that a certain percentage of their jobs are mapped out for students so that they can be meaningfully engaged at work and build their networks.