Wonkhe has always depended on our diverse and talented community of contributors.
Without your original ideas and analysis, we would neither exist nor be able to help drive forward the HE debate. Many people ask how to write a piece for us, so here’s our advice.
We want to hear from anyone with an interesting story to tell, no matter who they are. We enjoy lifting the lid on areas of the UK higher education sector that are seldom discussed – you don’t need to be enmeshed in politics to contribute. We’ve published blogs from students, academics, administrators, professional services and from people in FE colleges, brand new institutions, very old institutions, sector agencies and those outside the sector entirely.
We prefer personal rather than corporate contributions. If you send us a press release it’s unlikely we will turn it into an article. We’re much happier seeing text from experts on the cutting edge of policy, practice and ideas in HE.
You’ll need to be comfortable with your name and picture appearing alongside the article. Wonkhe is keen to credit authors, and we don’t accept pseudonyms or unattributed work. If you are employed we recommend that you are courteous enough to make your press team aware that you are writing something for us. If any of this causes an issue for you – do talk to us, we can often help.
We are particularly keen to see pitches from diverse, female, and non-binary authors – as white men are over-represented in our output, an issue we’ve discussed numerous times on the site and at our events.
Wonkhe is a blog, covering higher education policy in the UK. We are not interested in material that is not (loosely) written as a blog, or that is not related in some way to HE policy.
Ideally, we’d love your article to move the debate forward. This could be by adding a new perspective, by providing informed analysis, by drawing on history, or by predicting future developments. We don’t (ever) do personal attacks, and we look poorly on material that just perpetuates ongoing arguments. We look for a specific focus and clearly-defined angle – rather than a generic topic such as, say, “tuition fees”.
Though we cover a lot of news, we are neither a newspaper nor an aggregator. Timely content can be useful, but we like to set the agenda rather than follow it. A response to a recent report, or a recent announcement, can act as a useful peg for a piece. But if your point is unique and interesting enough it wouldn’t need a peg at all.
Any content submitted to Wonkhe should be completely original, please ask about this if you’re unsure.
- Use your own voice, and your own style, as far as you possibly can. Our readers are smart, spotting management-speak and cliches a mile off. Your article should be distinctive and authentic. We’d prefer you not to use too much jargon and to explain any new terms or abbreviations.
- Word limits for Wonkhe blogs range from 600-1,500 words, with 800-1,000 the sweet spot. If you contact us we will usually specify a word limit for your particular case.
- We don’t do footnotes, but please include hyperlinks (although not too many…)
- Vary the length of your sentences – long, and convoluted, structures tend to lose their meaning as they progress; making it difficult – if not impossible – for the reader to maintain the thread of an argument: thus few people will persevere to the long-delayed conclusion. In contrast – short phrases stand out. They grab the attention. But can sound like a politician’s speech. So don’t use them too often.
- An extended metaphor is like dinner with a rhinoceros – it can work but is notoriously tricky. If you are going to attempt it, be careful not to obscure what you are actually saying.
- A good opening paragraph introduces the argument and draws the reader in – but don’t do an academic paper style abstract, as that gives the game away entirely. Likewise, a good final paragraph should tie up any loose ends and offer a takeaway or conclusion.
- English is the preferred language of Wonkhe – we’d ask that you write clearly and within generally accepted grammatical rules. Precisely how formal we are about grammar is a topic of endless fascinating debate within the editorial team.
Please send a pitch to the team (or if you prefer a personal contact, to Debbie, DK, Minto, Arthi, or Jim). This could be a short outline of what you want to write, when and why, or the first draft of your article (already in Google Docs and shared with us if you want a gold star). Please also include a high-quality .JPG headshot photograph (1000x1000px for preference), a two-line biography of yourself, and your Twitter handle.
We’ll get back to you as soon as we can. On occasion, we may politely decline. If we do want to publish we’ll come back to you with suggestions, edits or requests for further information. We know our audience so reserve the right to use our judgement in editing your work at any point, with the aim of improving its clarity and impact. We will endeavour to let you know when we hope to publish.
Each article has an open comments section for readers to add their thoughts and responses. These comments are spam-filtered but not monitored or edited by Wonkhe. We would encourage you to read and respond – our community is a very supportive one prepared for informed debate. If you have concerns about a comment please don’t hesitate to contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
We very, very rarely accept work that has already been published. We kindly ask that you do not republish elsewhere without asking us.