Subscribe

Briefings

Daily BriefingEvery weekday · by 8amHigher education's essential morning read.Monday BriefingWeekly · MondaysThe full week ahead in HE policy.Friday ReviewWeekly · Friday lunchtimesWhat you need to know about the week just gone.

Newsletters & more

HE InfluencePolitics and policy and the way the sector is seen.HE CounselNewGovernance, law and regulation for anyone following legal developments.Policy RadarThe monthly live policy briefing – watch live or catch the replay on the portal.

Services

Wonkhe PassFull access for your whole institution.Wonkhe SUs PassFor students' unions – briefings, recordings and training.Free briefingThe Monday Briefing, Lite edition – free.
About Us+
About WonkhePeopleOur partnersWrite for WonkheContact us
Events
Latest+
Explore the whole archiveDataWonkhe researchLong readsAnalysisCommentWonk Corner
Podcast
SUs
Friday 25 September 2026Home of the higher education debate

Copyright © 2026 Thesis House Ltd.

Wonkhe is published by Thesis House Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no. 08784934), 31–35 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TE.

  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Show not tell: the knowledge exchange concordat

Trevor McMillan and Alice Frost explain that the Knowledge Exchange Concordat will enable universities to communicate their strengths and future aspirations.

This article is more than 7 years old

Comment|3/05/19
Trevor McMillan

Trevor McMillan

Professor Trevor McMillan is Vice Chancellor of Keele University
Alice Frost

Alice Frost

Alice Frost is Director of Knowledge Exchange Policy at Research England.
Tags
  • knowledge exchange
Trevor McMillan
Professor Trevor McMillan is Vice Chancellor of Keele University

Knowledge exchange – the sharing of ideas, research, skills and expertise between universities and its partners – in its broadest sense is critical to the performance of a university.

Occasionally it may directly create financial income streams, but primarily it increases the impact of our research and education or the fulfilment of our civic and societal roles.

Lost in translation

As a sector we have not always been good at talking about what we do and the conversation around technology transfer in particular has too often been captured by those who are critical of universities. This criticism is sometimes justifiable – but more often made in the absence of a full appreciation of the diverse dynamics and functions of a university.

Within Whitehall in particular, universities need to get better at conveying to all departments the numerous ways in which we work with various partners to drive innovation and solve specific problems. Despite the importance of such activity to key government priorities like the industrial strategy, it is not unusual for universities to hear visiting ministers confess they had no idea of the breadth and depth of activity taking place within institutions.

It is now over two years since our report for HEFCE on technology transfer identified the strong, globally comparable performance amongst this element of knowledge exchange in UK universities. It did, however, highlight the need for clarity of purpose and process alongside institutional leadership as important considerations for universities to further improve our interactions with critical partners in technology transfer and knowledge exchange.

New approaches

Since then the conversation has split into the development of the Knowledge Exchange Framework (KEF) to provide the metrics that allow us to better understand our performance and a Knowledge Exchange Concordat (KEC) to allow us to explain what we do, how we do it and what steps we are taking to get better at knowledge exchange.

An approach to the KEF was published in February and is currently running through a pilot of 21 universities representing different parts of the sector. Today UUK and GuildHE, following the work of a joint UUK/Research England Advisory Group, has released a consultation on a draft of a concordat that aims to allow all universities to demonstrate their approaches and strengths in knowledge exchange as well as plan for how the sector can improve.

Knowledge exchange concordat

The aim of the KEC is to provide a framework – definitely NOT a checklist. It is a set of high-level principles under which there is a set of possible enablers that could form part of the university response. These have largely been trialled and refined over several months so it is hoped that they will allow all universities across the sector to respond in a way appropriate to their own mission and the demands of their partners and stakeholders.

While the consultation is largely aimed at universities we will be continuing to consult with public and private sector organisations, in particular those that are funders, to gain their reflections on the value of a concordat of this sort.

At a time when it is more important than ever that the many benefits of universities to society need to be highlighted, especially in the context of a forthcoming government spending review, we hope that the KEC can play a role for all universities in framing the way they engage with external partners.

Related articles

Students are working more than ever. Or are they?

Jim Dickinson | Comment | 25/09/26

Image of the Singapore skyline

Lessons in collaboration from Singapore

James Coe | Comment | 25/09/26

Image of a postcard of the University of Birmingham bell tower on a cork board

Higher education postcard: Old Joe

Hugh Jones | Comment | 25/09/26

A field guide to mergers in higher education

Richard Mills | Comment | 24/09/26

If Scotland’s university funding problem is systemic, the response must be too

Vicki Stott | Comment | 24/09/26

There’s nine more pieces for the Quality Code

Nic Beech | Comment | 23/09/26

Comments · 1

New comments will come back with sign-in later this year.

What is the Knowledge Exchange Concordat? (KEC) – KEVRI · 25 Jun 2021

[…] they state, ‘’The Knowledge Exchange Framework (KEF) provides the metrics that allow us to better […]