Researchers need networks too
A report in the Chronicle notes:
A $12.2-million federal stimulus grant from the National Institutes of Health will finance a network some are calling a Facebook for scientists. Several universities, including Cornell University and the University of Florida, will develop the network over the next two years in the hopes of helping scientists find other academics to work with.
If a researcher is looking for someone else in a very specialized field, he or she would usually think of all the people he has met or simply scan recent scientific journals for names, said Michael Conlon, interim director of biomedical informatics at the College of Medicine at the University of Florida and the principal investigator on the grant. Mr. Conlon calls those methods “haphazard.”
People using the network will be able to enter targeted inquiries into a search box. The results will show scholars in very specialized fields. The site will also reveal relationships between academics, such as whether someone has published an article with someone else, or whether someone was an adviser to someone else.
But why create a new network to achieve this? Aren’t existing networks like Facebook or LinkedIn able to do this kind of thing better and more efficiently?
Another site is designed to serve more or less the same purpose already exists: http://www.academia.edu .
I really can’t see the point of this amount of investment for something that, as you refer to Paul, pretty much already exists through networks such as Facebook and LinkedIn. Okay, maybe Facebook isn’t any good for this as communities tend to be formed around existing friendships and connections, and therefore it’s unlikely to help you find someone new. However, LinkedIn serves a slightly different purpose as through connections and group discussions you can find out so much more about a stranger. More ‘open’ networks have great potential here, such as Twitter, and the ability to build niche networks of… Read more »
Very interesting post. Facebook and current networks could mine their data and build connections based on more than the six degrees of separation but are locked into their own inertia – right? Niche networks can solve specific problems that Facebook or Linkedin are too big and broad to worry about, launching a light version and seeing if enough user’s validate they value the service should give them the exit velocity that Steve Blank refers to in Four Steps to The Epiphany. Only an iterative, agile and customer centric development model, i.e the user’s will decide. Taken some serious inspiration from… Read more »
Also to try and briefly answer the question as to whether current networks are more likely to be able to do this, and do it more efficiently – can the answer be taken seriously of I say yes but no. No references to Little Britain intended… Yes because they have the users, the loyalty and critical mass. A niche network like the one described in your post might seriously consider building connections with those networks through Applications and therefore use them as a platform for virality. On the other hand however the user’s on those networks are not there to… Read more »
Another site with potential in this direction is JournalFire, which acts as a publishing outlet for journal clubs, and a way for scientists and researchers to share with each other what they are reading, and where their own research stands. http://journalfire.org.