• About Us
    • About Wonkhe
    • Our subscriptions
    • People
    • Our partners
    • Pitch an article
    • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Latest
    • Explore the whole archive
    • Podcasts
    • Data
    • Wonkhe research
    • Long reads
    • Analysis
    • Comment
    • Wonk Corner
  • Jobs
    • Live jobs
    • Jobs posting & prices
  • Subscription
    • Our subscriptions
    • Wonkhe Pass
    • Wonkhe Mondays
    • Wonkhe Daily
    • Wonkhe SUs
    • Wonkhe Briefing
  • SUs
    • SUs HOME
    • SUs LOGIN
    • ADD NEW SUs USER
    • SUMMER TRAINING 2022
    • SUBSCRIPTION BENEFITS
    • BRIEFINGS INDEX
    • WEBINAR INDEX
    • FREE SPEECH
    • LATEST SUs BLOGS AND BRIEFINGS
  • icon-comments 3
  • About Us
    • About Wonkhe
    • Our subscriptions
    • People
    • Our partners
    • Pitch an article
    • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Latest
    • Explore the whole archive
    • Podcasts
    • Data
    • Wonkhe research
    • Long reads
    • Analysis
    • Comment
    • Wonk Corner
  • Jobs
    • Live jobs
    • Jobs posting & prices
  • Subscription
    • Our subscriptions
    • Wonkhe Pass
    • Wonkhe Mondays
    • Wonkhe Daily
    • Wonkhe SUs
    • Wonkhe Briefing
  • SUs
    • SUs HOME
    • SUs LOGIN
    • ADD NEW SUs USER
    • SUMMER TRAINING 2022
    • SUBSCRIPTION BENEFITS
    • BRIEFINGS INDEX
    • WEBINAR INDEX
    • FREE SPEECH
    • LATEST SUs BLOGS AND BRIEFINGS
This article is more than 2 years old
by Stephen Meek
Comment
28/10/19

Public engagement with evidence will help politicians make braver policy choices

Good politics is as vital a component of policy as good evidence. Public engagement with policy issues can help create political space for research evidence to cut through, argues Stephen Meek
This article is more than 2 years old
by Stephen Meek
Comment
28/10/19
wonkhe-brave
Image: Shutterstock
Stephen-Meek
Image: Shutterstock

Stephen Meek

Director

by Jim Dickinson
staff
25/10/19

Stephen Meek is the Director of the Institute for Policy and Engagement at the University of Nottingham.

Tags

  • policy
  • Politics
  • public engagement
  • REF
  • Research
Stephen Meek

Stephen Meek is the Director of the Institute for Policy and Engagement at the University of Nottingham.

Tags

  • policy
  • Politics
  • public engagement
  • REF
  • Research

“Policy shops” are fast becoming a must-have adjunct for the contemporary university.

The University of Nottingham’s new Institute for Policy and Engagement is being added to a list that includes the King’s Policy Institute, The Bennett Institute and CSAP in Cambridge, Policy@Manchester, Policy Scotland in Glasgow, the Wales Centre for Public Policy in Cardiff, UCL Public Policy, the IPR at Bath. There is even a national network – the Universities Policy Engagement Network.

It would be easy to see the rise of the policy shop as simply a response to the Research Excellence Framework (REF). Clearly the REF is a driver. It rewards impact increasingly generously, determining 20 per cent of outcomes in 2014, rising to 25 per cent in 2021, and the majority of case studies in 2014 involved policy impact in some form or other. So of course universities are going to invest in this space. They would be daft not to.

But what is interesting is how many of these new policy shops have ambitions and missions that extend far beyond the REF. This reflects the fact that – not surprisingly – translation of research into policy is of value in itself, not just because government encourages it. And it also reflects the fact that impact requires work. It is not simply a case of publish it and they will come.

Supply matters

There are three factors involved here. The first of these is improving supply. This has probably received the most attention, with impact blogs full of top ten tips on presenting research to policymakers. I have written at least two. This is all perfectly rational: in thinking about tackling any problem, it makes sense first to concentrate on the factors in your control. In our case that is the supply of evidence.

So we rightly spend time polishing our message, preparing our elevator pitch and our crisp, jargon-free two page policy brief. A common characteristic of academics, as well as think tanks, lobby groups and others who are effective in shaping policy, is that they understand how to present evidence in a way that is easily digested. Or in some cases, inversely correlated with funding transparency, making something that bears the outward appearance of evidence easily digested.

Demand matters too

However there is a danger in thinking that the key to stimulating demand is the quality of supply. That is to misunderstand the nature of the demand side, and what it means to make policy. While good evidence is a necessary condition for good policy, it isn’t sufficient. Policymakers and their advisors make policy decisions by synthesising evidence with a range of factors: resources (cash, people, time), consistency with other policies, coherence with core values and political mandate, deliverability, parliamentary arithmetic and public acceptability.

This means the mark of a good policy decision is not just fidelity to the evidence. Good politics is as vital a component of good policy as good evidence. Understanding the demand side means understanding that politics isn’t something that distorts policy, but is the means to deliver it. This is obvious to those that study policymaking, but not at all obvious to many academics who see it as a black box.

As a policymaker the most useful advice recognises the political environment and constraints that places on decision makers. This isn’t to say that advice should take these constraints as a given, and that we should only ever aim at things that sit in the Overton window. However it is to recognise that it will take more than simply shouting “but the evidence!” to help policymakers move beyond it.

The public

Which leads to a third aspect, which is every bit as important as the first two: engaging the public as well as policymakers. Politicians and policymakers rely on public consent, either directly or indirectly. The solutions to the wicked challenges we face – climate emergency, an ageing population, rising poverty – demand a lot of all of us, perhaps financially, or losing things we enjoy or rely on. The evidence might be crystal clear and the case compelling, but it is a brave politician who risks their whole mandate for an issue where they don’t think they have public support. A sceptical public, who does not hold politicians in high regard, is unlikely to be inclined to make sacrifices simply because it is told to do so.

So public engagement is a vital complement to engaging directly with policy makers if we want to have impact, especially where acting on evidence means moving the constraints on what is politically feasible. Surveys show we are trusted, and while we should not be naïve about the extent to which our expertise and authority alone will persuade people to do difficult things, we know that the best public engagement can generate agency and commitment to change as well as understanding.

Through engagement we can provide policymakers not just with evidence – but also make it easier for politicians to be brave by shifting the window of possible actions.

Share

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • icon-comments 3
  • icon-share

Share

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)

post list Latest articles

shutterstock_2025843968
Image: Shutterstock

How can we find the opportunities amid the disruption?

by Ant Bagshaw
Comment
30/06/22
wonkhe-letter-posted
Image: Shutterstock

The minister’s letter of note hints at a threat to autonomy

by Paul Greatrix
Registrarism
29/06/22
shutterstock_663459544
Image: Shutterstock

Can OfS cancel cancel culture?

by David Kernohan
Comment
29/06/22
Wonkhe-Octopus-Vulgaris
Image: Shutterstock

Octopus will change the way research is communicated

by Steven Hill
Comment
29/06/22
shutterstock_1708896964
Image: Shutterstock

Understanding and taking action on postgraduate diversity

by Louise Banahene
Comment
29/06/22
wonkhe-london
Image: Shutterstock

OfS uses London weighting – just not for providers

by Diana Beech
Comment
28/06/22
shutterstock_589180451
Image: Shutterstock

Going home for the summer?

by Shân Wareing
Analysis
28/06/22
Wonkhe-books-laptops-ikon2
Image: IKON

Learning technology needs to support learner success

by David Kernohan
Research
27/06/22
041 rag on cork
Image: Shutterstock

Higher Education Postcard: Rag Week

by Hugh Jones
Comment
25/06/22
Two men being motivated by money and love
Image: IKON

It’s time we gave students credit for helping out

by Jim Dickinson
Comment
24/06/22

3 responses to “Public engagement with evidence will help politicians make braver policy choices”

  1. Nick von Behr says:
    Oct 28 2019 at 8:41 am

    Nice piece and good luck with your new centre. I have just blogged about fake facts (see my behrfacts blog on WP) and my big concern is the poor ethics behind use of evidence by politicians, which I attribute very subjectively to one Vladimir Putin, arch manipulator of people and copied by many others nowadays sadly, including Trump, Cummings, Farage etc

    Reply
  2. Jeremy Swan says:
    Oct 29 2019 at 2:44 pm

    Thanks for sharing, Stephen. An excellent point there about the importance of public engagement in shifting policy debates.

    Reply
  3. Stephen Meek says:
    Oct 31 2019 at 8:12 am

    thanks both

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Related articles

wonkhe-links-system
Image: Shutterstock

Getting the system right for innovation

by Amanda Lamb
Comment
22/06/22
wonkhe-global-network
Image: Shutterstock

Research and freedom of speech: a tale of unintended consequences

by James Coe
Comment
20/06/22
wonkhe-brexit-exodus
Image: Shutterstock

It’s more than the money: The future of European research funding

by James Coe
Comment
7/06/22
Wonkhe_sea_of_red_tape
Image: Shutterstock

It is the quality of the bureaucracy, not the quantity, which needs addressing

by James Coe
Analysis
26/05/22
Wonkhe-Prizes-all
Image: Shutterstock

Why is a diverse sector focused on such limited narratives of research success?

by Cameron Neylon
Analysis
23/05/22
Wonkhe-unicorn-stars
Image: Shutterstock

Do marginal gains approaches in universities fuel REF myths?

by Órla Meadhbh Murray
Analysis
18/05/22
wonkhe-pie-changing-allocations
Image: Shutterstock

The history and future of QR funding for research

by Dave Radcliffe
Analysis
17/05/22
00029341
Image: IKON

The government is “disengaging” from NUS. Does it matter?

by Jim Dickinson
Analysis
16/05/22

Copyright © 2022 Wonkhe Ltd.

Company Number: 08784934

Wonkhe Ltd, Lower Third Floor Evelyn Suite, Quantum House,

22-24 Red Lion Court, London, United Kingdom, EC4A 3EB

  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Wonkhe Mondays

By submitting you agree to our terms and conditions

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.