• About Us
    • About Wonkhe
    • Our subscriptions
    • People
    • Our partners
    • Pitch an article
    • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Latest
    • Explore the whole archive
    • Podcasts
    • Data
    • Wonkhe research
    • Long reads
    • Analysis
    • Comment
    • Wonk Corner
  • Jobs
    • Live jobs
    • Jobs posting & prices
  • Subscription
    • Briefings sign up
    • Subscription services
    • Check my sub status
    • Daily Briefing
    • Wonkhe SUs
    • Policy Update
  • SUs
    • SUs HOME
    • SUs LOGIN
    • ADD NEW SUs USER
    • EXPLAINERS INDEX
    • WEBINARS INDEX
    • LATEST SUs BLOGS
    • SU STRATEGIES
  • Wonkhe Bluesky
  • Wonkhe Bluesky
  • icon-comments 3
  • About Us
    • About Wonkhe
    • Our subscriptions
    • People
    • Our partners
    • Pitch an article
    • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Latest
    • Explore the whole archive
    • Podcasts
    • Data
    • Wonkhe research
    • Long reads
    • Analysis
    • Comment
    • Wonk Corner
  • Jobs
    • Live jobs
    • Jobs posting & prices
  • Subscription
    • Briefings sign up
    • Subscription services
    • Check my sub status
    • Daily Briefing
    • Wonkhe SUs
    • Policy Update
  • SUs
    • SUs HOME
    • SUs LOGIN
    • ADD NEW SUs USER
    • EXPLAINERS INDEX
    • WEBINARS INDEX
    • LATEST SUs BLOGS
    • SU STRATEGIES
  • Wonkhe Bluesky
This article is more than 5 years old
by Stephen Meek
Comment
28/10/19

Public engagement with evidence will help politicians make braver policy choices

Good politics is as vital a component of policy as good evidence. Public engagement with policy issues can help create political space for research evidence to cut through, argues Stephen Meek
This article is more than 5 years old
by Stephen Meek
Comment
28/10/19
wonkhe-brave
Image: Shutterstock
Stephen-Meek
Image: Shutterstock

Stephen Meek

Director

by Jim Dickinson
staff
25/10/19

Stephen Meek is the Director of the Institute for Policy and Engagement at the University of Nottingham.

Tags

  • policy
  • Politics
  • public engagement
  • REF
  • Research
Stephen Meek

Stephen Meek is the Director of the Institute for Policy and Engagement at the University of Nottingham.

Tags

  • policy
  • Politics
  • public engagement
  • REF
  • Research

“Policy shops” are fast becoming a must-have adjunct for the contemporary university.

The University of Nottingham’s new Institute for Policy and Engagement is being added to a list that includes the King’s Policy Institute, The Bennett Institute and CSAP in Cambridge, Policy@Manchester, Policy Scotland in Glasgow, the Wales Centre for Public Policy in Cardiff, UCL Public Policy, the IPR at Bath. There is even a national network – the Universities Policy Engagement Network.

It would be easy to see the rise of the policy shop as simply a response to the Research Excellence Framework (REF). Clearly the REF is a driver. It rewards impact increasingly generously, determining 20 per cent of outcomes in 2014, rising to 25 per cent in 2021, and the majority of case studies in 2014 involved policy impact in some form or other. So of course universities are going to invest in this space. They would be daft not to.

But what is interesting is how many of these new policy shops have ambitions and missions that extend far beyond the REF. This reflects the fact that – not surprisingly – translation of research into policy is of value in itself, not just because government encourages it. And it also reflects the fact that impact requires work. It is not simply a case of publish it and they will come.

Supply matters

There are three factors involved here. The first of these is improving supply. This has probably received the most attention, with impact blogs full of top ten tips on presenting research to policymakers. I have written at least two. This is all perfectly rational: in thinking about tackling any problem, it makes sense first to concentrate on the factors in your control. In our case that is the supply of evidence.

So we rightly spend time polishing our message, preparing our elevator pitch and our crisp, jargon-free two page policy brief. A common characteristic of academics, as well as think tanks, lobby groups and others who are effective in shaping policy, is that they understand how to present evidence in a way that is easily digested. Or in some cases, inversely correlated with funding transparency, making something that bears the outward appearance of evidence easily digested.

Demand matters too

However there is a danger in thinking that the key to stimulating demand is the quality of supply. That is to misunderstand the nature of the demand side, and what it means to make policy. While good evidence is a necessary condition for good policy, it isn’t sufficient. Policymakers and their advisors make policy decisions by synthesising evidence with a range of factors: resources (cash, people, time), consistency with other policies, coherence with core values and political mandate, deliverability, parliamentary arithmetic and public acceptability.

This means the mark of a good policy decision is not just fidelity to the evidence. Good politics is as vital a component of good policy as good evidence. Understanding the demand side means understanding that politics isn’t something that distorts policy, but is the means to deliver it. This is obvious to those that study policymaking, but not at all obvious to many academics who see it as a black box.

As a policymaker the most useful advice recognises the political environment and constraints that places on decision makers. This isn’t to say that advice should take these constraints as a given, and that we should only ever aim at things that sit in the Overton window. However it is to recognise that it will take more than simply shouting “but the evidence!” to help policymakers move beyond it.

The public

Which leads to a third aspect, which is every bit as important as the first two: engaging the public as well as policymakers. Politicians and policymakers rely on public consent, either directly or indirectly. The solutions to the wicked challenges we face – climate emergency, an ageing population, rising poverty – demand a lot of all of us, perhaps financially, or losing things we enjoy or rely on. The evidence might be crystal clear and the case compelling, but it is a brave politician who risks their whole mandate for an issue where they don’t think they have public support. A sceptical public, who does not hold politicians in high regard, is unlikely to be inclined to make sacrifices simply because it is told to do so.

So public engagement is a vital complement to engaging directly with policy makers if we want to have impact, especially where acting on evidence means moving the constraints on what is politically feasible. Surveys show we are trusted, and while we should not be naïve about the extent to which our expertise and authority alone will persuade people to do difficult things, we know that the best public engagement can generate agency and commitment to change as well as understanding.

Through engagement we can provide policymakers not just with evidence – but also make it easier for politicians to be brave by shifting the window of possible actions.

Share

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • icon-comments 3
  • icon-share

Share

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)

fest Festival side

TFOHE25_Website_Column_1000x1680_Book@2x
TFOHE25_Website_Column_1000x1680_Book@2x

View here
by Mark Leach
featured message
19/05/23

post list Latest articles

Wonkhe_WonkheShow_Social_Blue@2x
Image: Wonkhe

Podcast: Mergers, reshuffle

by Team Wonkhe
Podcasts
12/09/25
wonkhe-admit-one
Image: Shutterstock

High tariff providers may be making medium tariff offers

by David Kernohan
Data
12/09/25
Untitled
Image: Shutterstock

We cannot address the AI challenge by acting as though assessment is a standalone activity

by Duna Sabri
Comment
12/09/25
we4jgtfioewhrugiooe
Image: Shutterstock

Comparing students with the general population is misleading when it comes to suicide

by Robert Abrahart
Comment
12/09/25
181clarksononcork
Image: Shutterstock

Higher education postcard: matriculation

by Hugh Jones
Comment
12/09/25
Shutterstock_2375488919
Image: Shutterstock

Falling mature student numbers requires policy action

by Rachel Hewitt
Comment
11/09/25
wonkhe-merge
Image: Shutterstock

The first multi-university group arrives

by Mark Leach
Comment
10/09/25
efgnkwjerfghnjkwe
Image: Shutterstock

Academic coaching is data-driven support for students in the dark

by Buxi Duan
Comment
10/09/25
Shutterstock_2408684007
Image: Shutterstock

There’s no magic wand for student wellbeing

by Ben Lewis
Comment
9/09/25
ewgiufvghwuier
Image: Shutterstock

Back to the future for the TEF? Back to school for OfS?

by Paul Ashwin
Comment
9/09/25
rating

3 Comments
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Nick von Behr
5 years ago

Nice piece and good luck with your new centre. I have just blogged about fake facts (see my behrfacts blog on WP) and my big concern is the poor ethics behind use of evidence by politicians, which I attribute very subjectively to one Vladimir Putin, arch manipulator of people and copied by many others nowadays sadly, including Trump, Cummings, Farage etc

Reply
Jeremy Swan
5 years ago

Thanks for sharing, Stephen. An excellent point there about the importance of public engagement in shifting policy debates.

Reply
Stephen Meek
5 years ago

thanks both

Reply

Related articles

Shutterstock_2583265173
Image: Shutterstock

The incentives don’t work they just make growth worse

by James Coe
Comment
8/09/25
Wonkhe_WonkheShow_Social_Blue@2x
Image: Wonkhe

Podcast: Year ahead, international, governance

by Team Wonkhe
Podcasts
5/09/25
Refreshing,Green,Creamy,Nettle,Soup,In,A,White,Bowl,On
Image: Shutterstock

What’s coming up for HE policy in 2025–26

by Debbie McVitty
Comment
1/09/25
Access,Point,Through,The,Dry,Stone,Wall,Leading,To,A
Image: Shutterstock

Building collective capacity to defend and celebrate HE

by Team Wonkhe
Comment
1/09/25
Shutterstock_2126860385
Image: Shutterstock

Peer review is broken, and pedagogical research has a fix

by Madeleine Pownall
Comment
1/08/25
Shutterstock_2476174413
Image: Shutterstock

The disagreements on REF cannot go on forever – it may be time for a compromise

by James Coe
Comment
21/07/25
AAA
Image: Wonkhe

Podcast: AI and jobs, provider closure, UCAS figures

by Team Wonkhe
Podcasts
17/07/25
Shutterstock_2393375781
Image: Shutterstock

Embed! How to save the civic agenda

by James Coe
Comment
14/07/25

Copyright © 2025 Wonkhe Ltd.

Company Number: 08784934

Wonkhe Bluesky

Wonkhe Ltd, 31-35 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TE

  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Wonkhe Mondays

By submitting you agree to our terms and conditions