Good morning. There’s a major ministerial intervention today on antisemitism and news on Augar. We’ve been looking at implications for SUs of complaints about strikes. There’s a new book out with things for SUs to think about, an article on students as scapegoats, and new briefings up on league tables and attendance monitoring. Have a … Continued
This article is more than 7 years old

Good morning. There’s a major ministerial intervention today on antisemitism and news on Augar. We’ve been looking at implications for SUs of complaints about strikes. There’s a new book out with things for SUs to think about, an article on students as scapegoats, and new briefings up on league tables and attendance monitoring. Have a great week, and a fabulous weekend.
Jim Dickinson, Wonkhe SUs
Universities Minister Chris Skidmore is today urging universities and SUs to advance efforts to tackle “unacceptable religious hatred” in higher education, calling on universities and SUs to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism. In a letter being sent to universities this week, the minister calls on institutions and students’ unions to “step up and tackle” antisemitism. The intervention picks up coverage on BBC News, the Guardian, iNews, the Mail.and the Times, which also has a comment piece from Chris Skidmore.
The move will be seen as controversial in some quarters - whilst NUS adopted the definition in 2017, the University and College Union carried a motion in 2017 rejecting use of the IHRA definition, and Universities UK has resisted taking a clear position on whether universities should adopt the definition, as it claims different universities have received conflicting legal advice on the issue.
The Jewish Leadership Council, the Union of Jewish Students and the Community Security Trust have also raised reports of “unfair practices” where Jewish societies have been asked to pay up to £2,000 for their own security at speaker events on campus, which Chris Skidmore is concerned may amount to indirect discrimination. The intervention refers to the guidance published in February, led by the Equality and Human Rights Commission, which it says “clearly states” the legal rights and obligations around free speech for institutions, SUs and societies to ensure they do not discriminate in the way they organise events.
However whilst the anti-discrimination responsibilities are clear, there remains a major lack of clarity over who should bear security costs when an event featuring an external speaker attracts controversy. In a separate development this week, a row broke out after a university cancelled a European elections hustings due to be attended by UKIP candidate Carl Benjamin - he had been expected to attend the event organised by the SU debating society at UWE today but there had been growing calls for him to be banned from the debate and promises of protests. UWE blamed concerns over security when it cancelled the event but has come under fire both from people who claim it is effectively no-platforming him and from others who argue it should have banned just him rather than calling off the debate.
Different universities have different approaches to security and costs - in some, the university will pick up the tab, whilst in others the SU or the society itself is expected to cover costs - and the issue of responsibility for those costs is rarely covered in block grant discussions or Freedom of Speech policies. The guidance itself said that it would be “reasonable” to cancel an event if the participants would not be safe from physical harm, for instance, if there was a threat of violent protests. However, “reasonably practicable” steps, such as increased security within “reasonable cost” should be taken. The definition of “reasonable” is likely to be very different in the context of a society or charitable SU budget, when compared to a university budget.
On Wonkhe: Earlier this year Jim Dickinson took a detailed look at guidance from the EHRC and DfE on Freedom of Speech on campus.
On Wonkhe SUs: We also examined in detail implications for SUs arising from the guidance.
The Office of the Independent Adjudicator – which adjudicates on student complaints in England and Wales – this week published a new set of case summaries of complaints that arose from last year’s USS pensions-related industrial action. The case reviews hit the headlines because many involve financial compensation. Of course, that compensation has only been awarded to specific students in particular situations where students have followed the correct procedures. OfS’ position as regulator where the cases involve systemic breaches of consumer law was unclear, so we asked them about their approach. They said:
“We recognise that last year’s strikes caused significant disruption for some students and it’s right that students have various avenues of redress open to them where their studies have been disrupted. These helpful case summaries show that the Office of the Independent Adjudicator considers complaints on their individual merits, including suggesting that universities should make every effort to ensure that there is mitigation of any lost teaching time, disrupted assessments or other lost support, wherever possible.
“Where this is not possible partial refunds should be offered. In the event of future industrial action we will be expecting universities to take robust action to mitigate the impact on students. Universities will also need to clearly explain to students both how they might be affected and the steps that the university will be taking to ensure that the impact is kept to a minimum.”
“Students’ awareness of these rights is an issue we have identified. As stated in our 19/20 business plan we plan to evaluate and report on the advice available to students about their rights as consumers.
Read more on Wonkhe SUs:
What are the implications for SUs arising out of the OIA's case summaries of student complaints about industrial action? Team Wonkhe dissects the material.
This week former SU societies co-ordinator Duncan Exley published a great new book on social mobility. Writing in the New Statesman, MP David Lammy said it provides a “sincere warning” of what happens when we abandon the principles of opportunity and mobility. “When we swallow empty rhetoric of meritocracy without asking what it really means; when we surrender to unfairness by refusing to support each other; when we mistake privilege for meritocracy; that’s the end of aspiration”.
What really marks it out is that unlike much of the material on the subject, student voices run throughout the book - as Duncan said on Wonkhe last year, “ladders are best designed by people who know what it’s like to climb one”. And there’s a whole bunch of input from and reflections on students’ unions, some of which we’ve put on the SUs site today.
On Wonkhe SUs: Some extracts focussed on SUs from “The End of Aspiration”, published this week.
On Wonkhe: Social mobility is in freefall. Duncan Exley, author of a new book on the subject, examines the role that universities play in the problem.
The BBC is today reporting that the Augar review of post-18 education and funding could be published in the next two weeks, as part of a set of announcements designed to shore up Prime Minister Theresa May’s “legacy”. BBC education and family correspondent Sean Coughlan’s report suggests that the findings of the review, which has been delayed by the Brexit process, are set to be announced straight after the Bank Holiday weekend at the end of this month - in the window between the EU elections and the visit of Donald Trump.
Over on the main Wonkhe site in late June we are planning a students and SUs special, and we’d love you to write a blog for us. You might have advice for the UK’s VCs on handling SU officers. You might have reflections on how to lobby for change. You could have a piece on a particular policy issue or a selection of things that you wish someone had told you when you started. You might have an agenda setting policy idea or a challenge for the sector to address. If you have an idea and would like to pitch it to us do drop us an email - we’re excited to showcase SU officers and staff for the wider Wonkhe audience.
We’ve spoken to lots of you over the past few weeks, and the consistent feedback on our webinars has been a) you and your (new) officers would be much more likely to take part once the new year starts, and b) you really need us to record them.
We hear you - so instead of carrying on this term and then pausing over the summer (which is the original plan in the subscription contract) we’ve resolved instead to pause now and to run webinars across the summer. Do let us know if you have any feedback about that - and do suggest topics that you’d like to see us cover when they return in late June.
A full guide to the benefits that you are entitled through via Wonkhe SUs is available for both basic and full subscribers.
This week we discuss the government’s strategy on research and innovation and the Minister’s intervention on anti-semitism. Duncan Exley, former Director of the Equality Trust, has published a book scrutinising the UK’s social mobility problem and we chat Wonkhe's Car Parking Ranking.
With Luke Myer of Edge Hill Students’ Union; Sarah Barr-Miller of UCAS; and Wonkhe’s David Kernohan.
You can subscribe to the podcast on iTunes, Google podcasts, Spotify, Deezer, RadioPublic, Podchaser, Castbox, or via your favourite app with the RSS feed. And if you’d like to be a guest, do email the team.
We’ve opened registration for Start 2019, our one day event aimed specifically at new SU officers. At this unmissable event, Wonkhe’s team of experts will spend the morning providing a comprehensive introduction to all the key issues inside the higher education and students’ union policy landscape.
Then, in the afternoon, participants will be immersed in the ultimate simulation exercise designed to set officers up for all the challenges in the year head. This event is initially only open to student officers at Wonkhe SUs subscriber unions. Book your incoming team on now.
In addition, every year new staff join the student movement from a range of backgrounds and careers – but there’s little in the way of induction into the UK’s unique students’ union sector.
At “So you’re new to SUs?” Wonkhe’s expert team of wonks and guests from across the student movement will provide the ultimate briefing on working in this sector, with sessions on key aspects of student life, the history of the student movement, higher education, working with officers and universities and much more. Save the date.
What could a “whole campus approach” to sexual violence look like? Lots of universities and SUs right now are working on policy and how they support for those impacted by sexual violence and prevention. A new manuscript outlines the structure and development of the University of Otago’s whole campus approach to sexual violence that includes staff and students and addresses policy, support and prevention work. The model is usefully described with a focus on the theoretical approach to the model and the theory of change guiding ongoing evaluation.
Meanwhile, thesis season continues - this week there’s a new US study out exploring perceptions of student safety that seeks to determine the factors that impact student perceptions of campus safety, and to determine whether perceptions of campus safety have an impact on student engagement in campus and student activities. It finds that factors that impact perceptions of safety included gender, university facilities, and prior victimization. Students in the study utilised interesting “precautionary behaviors” that enhanced feelings of safety, particularly while engaging in student and campus activities.
There’s interesting new research out this week on student participation in the governance of medical and veterinary education that sought to work out which factors make student participation in institutional governance a success or a failure. It finds that a cohesive, well-organised and independent student organisation can have a crucial impact on student participation in educational governance processes, and that a clear school policy on student participation and better introduction, feedback and coaching of representatives should be provided.
Student mental health came up at PMQs this week. Chelmsford MP Vicky Ford wanted the Prime Minister to urge the Secretaries of State for Health and for Education to work together to provide a specific fund for universities to develop new and innovative ways to help students with mental health pressures. She’d obviously not heard about OfS’ “Challenge Competition” on the issue, but was “happy to ask both the Health and Education Secretaries to consider options to look at the issue further. There was also an interesting Westminster Hall debate on licensing in Durham that’s worth a read.
Earlier this week ex-LSE sabb and “money saving expert” Martin Lewis hit the headlines earlier this week when (together with the Russell Group) he called on the Government to scrap the current student loan statement, after 90% of respondents said a redesigned version of the statement helped them understand the system. However, HE economics expert Andrew McGettigan spotted a flaw - and said the “revamp” misfires because they based a key part of their statements on an “elementary mathematical blunder”.
Graduate recruitment platform Debut has published "Working with class: The state of social immobility in graduate recruitment". It finds that over a third of 18-25 year olds are put off joining a business if they perceive the workforce to be made up predominantly of middle and upper-class employees – equating to 2.5 million young people. It argues that this is costing businesses and the wider economy £270 billion per year. The research also found two thirds (66%) of graduates felt they had to change "who they are" to "make a good impression" during an interview and the majority (64%) said they weren’t able to express themselves as individuals during application processes.
One in 20 places to study nursing were not filled this year, according to a new report that suggests concerns about the cost of study are deterring potential students. The Open University (OU) analysis “Breaking Barriers to Nursing”, found that one in four (24%) students drop out before completing their study – 6,740 potential nurses from each intake - while one in three (32%) currently studying are unsure if they still want to become a nurse. Money, specifically the cost of study or living away from home, as well as concerns about paying back student loans, is the most significant barrier experienced deterring a third (33%). Other important issues to consider include travel, (13%) entry requirements (11%) and workload (17%).
The Scottish Council for Voluntary Organisations has updated its charity bank account comparison table. It offers a chance to remind trustees that they should also be regularly reviewing the financial management of their organisation to ensure that it is as effective as possible and covers issues like dual authorisation to protect against fraud, changing a signatory if a trustee leaves, and ethical banking. SCVO has also published a blog on developing annual reports.
At Wonkhe we cover the intersection between higher education, students and the political arena. Some highlights include:
The full archive on politics is available on the site.
Commenting returns with Wonkhe accounts – coming soon.
Rhiannon Ellis | SU Blogs | 1/03/22