This article is more than 2 years old
SLC data shows the sector takes non-continuation seriously
The Student Loans Company release of early-in-year student withdrawal notifications is a good, if imperfect, lens on the experiences of undergraduate students.
The timeseries started back during the pandemic, when many were concerned that students – who were unable to have the traditional student experience – would drop out of their courses. Because the data here excludes students who simply never arrive (a surprising number), we do get a sense of how many and what proportion of students start a course and decide not to complete it. This is the August release, so completes the 2023-24 academic year data.
As I say, it isn’t perfect: because SLC data submission isn’t perfect. As with other sector data collections providers have the opportunity to “correct” the record after the year in question is complete – this has happened for 2018-19 and 2019-20, but not for years since. So comparisons between years need to be done with care.
But what we are seeing for English domiciled students is positive – both the proportion and numbers of students withdrawing from each year of study are down on last year. The exception is foundation years, the proportion of students withdrawing from foundation years is down, but the number of students withdrawing is up, due to a growth in the number of students on foundation years.
Why? Well, it is very difficult even to speculate. It is possible that providers, buoyed by advances in learner analytics, chastened by an Office for Students focus on outcomes measures, and ever-aware of the financial implications of student attrition, are pulling their fingers out. Well done everyone, if so.