Subscribe

Briefings

Daily BriefingEvery weekday · by 8amHigher education's essential morning read.Monday BriefingWeekly · MondaysThe full week ahead in HE policy.Friday ReviewWeekly · Friday lunchtimesWhat you need to know about the week just gone.

Newsletters & more

HE InfluencePolitics and policy and the way the sector is seen.HE CounselNewGovernance, law and regulation for anyone following legal developments.Policy RadarThe monthly live policy briefing – watch live or catch the replay on the portal.

Services

Wonkhe PassFull access for your whole institution.Wonkhe SUs PassFor students' unions – briefings, recordings and training.Free briefingThe Monday Briefing, Lite edition – free.
About Us+
About WonkhePeopleOur partnersWrite for WonkheContact us
Events
Latest+
Explore the whole archiveDataWonkhe researchLong readsAnalysisCommentWonk Corner
Podcast
SUs
Thursday 24 September 2026Home of the higher education debate

Copyright © 2026 Thesis House Ltd.

Wonkhe is published by Thesis House Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no. 08784934), 31–35 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TE.

  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Thesis
David Kernohan

David Kernohan

David Kernohan is Deputy Editor of Wonkhe

This article is more than 5 years old

Wonk Corner30/07/21 · 15:33
Tags
  • Fees and Funding
  • OfS

This article is more than 5 years old

Wonk Corner|30/07/21 · 15:33

OfS funding allocations 2021-22

There’s only one surprise here – the “high cost funding” allocations retain that name. There’s no “strategic” here.

David Kernohan
David Kernohan is Deputy Editor of Wonkhe

The actual funding of course, perfectly reflects the DfE strategy as announced. Here's the OfS press release, and here's a plot of the allocations:

[Full screen]

And here's a plot of the percentage difference between this year and last year (I've filtered out FE colleges by default as there are some massive outliers involving not much money, but you can easily add them in using the filter):

[Full screen]

Here the region filter tells quite the story if you set it to "London" - the whole bottom end of the table, showing cuts of between 40 and 100 per cent over last year, is providers based in the capital.

There's nothing more to say really. All the negative effects we warned against in our coverage, and you warned against in your consultation responses, have come to pass. Possibly someone, somewhere in DfE, is happy.