Subscribe

Briefings

Daily BriefingEvery weekday · by 8amHigher education's essential morning read.Monday BriefingWeekly · MondaysThe full week ahead in HE policy.Friday ReviewWeekly · Friday lunchtimesWhat you need to know about the week just gone.

Newsletters & more

HE InfluencePolitics and policy and the way the sector is seen.HE CounselNewGovernance, law and regulation for anyone following legal developments.Policy RadarThe monthly live policy briefing – watch live or catch the replay on the portal.

Services

Wonkhe PassFull access for your whole institution.Wonkhe SUs PassFor students' unions – briefings, recordings and training.Free briefingThe Monday Briefing, Lite edition – free.
About Us+
About WonkhePeopleOur partnersWrite for WonkheContact us
Events
Latest+
Explore the whole archiveDataWonkhe researchLong readsAnalysisCommentWonk Corner
Podcast
SUs
Thursday 24 September 2026Home of the higher education debate

Copyright © 2026 Thesis House Ltd.

Wonkhe is published by Thesis House Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no. 08784934), 31–35 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TE.

  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Thesis
Jim Dickinson

Jim Dickinson

Jim is an Associate Editor (SUs) at Wonkhe

This article is more than 5 years old

Wonk Corner9/11/20 · 07:30
Tags
  • admissions

This article is more than 5 years old

Wonk Corner|9/11/20 · 07:30

Move offers until after exams, says UCAS

This morning the Universities and Colleges Admissions Service stages a dramatic intervention on admissions.

Jim Dickinson
Jim is an Associate Editor (SUs) at Wonkhe

It feels like a long time ago now, but improving the application and offer system for undergraduate students was in the Conservative manifesto in 2019. Having been told to jump, both Universities and UK and the Office for Students said “how high” by launching reviews, with the latter officially shuttered until at least Autumn 2021 and the UUK one set to appear soon.

But calls for post-qualification admissions intensified during both the early part of the pandemic and over the examnishambles, and this morning UCAS enters the fray by pre-announcing the results of its own review in The Times. It seems two options are under consideration - one where offers are moved to after results, and another that would move the whole application process to after when grades are confirmed, pushing the university term back to January.

If we were in any doubt about UCAS’ preferred option, we’re nudged in a particular direction in an accompanying op-ed. The first option would address issues around predicted grades without shrinking the application window in Year 13 to explore and weigh up choices, as well as representing an opportunity to give “equal weight to non-degree options” by aligning academic and technical results days to create “true parity” - which seems a stretch.

The second option is much less attractive. It would “compromise fairness”, and “squeeze” results and decisions such as finding somewhere to live into a “high speed, high-pressure process” that ultimately would be at the expense of students. It would also create a five month gap that is “fine for anyone with independent wealth or connections” and “put us totally out of sync internationally”. Paid traineeships or a National Citizen Service programme to give young people real-world skills and build character are posited as ways to fill the gap, but it seems unlikely.

We’re reminded that bringing the devolved nations along will be essential to avoid a devolution divide but more importantly told that UCAS will publish full details on the impact of both models in the coming weeks.