Subscribe

Briefings

Daily BriefingEvery weekday · by 8amHigher education's essential morning read.Monday BriefingWeekly · MondaysThe full week ahead in HE policy.Friday ReviewWeekly · Friday lunchtimesWhat you need to know about the week just gone.

Newsletters & more

HE InfluencePolitics and policy and the way the sector is seen.HE CounselNewGovernance, law and regulation for anyone following legal developments.Policy RadarThe monthly live policy briefing – watch live or catch the replay on the portal.

Services

Wonkhe PassFull access for your whole institution.Wonkhe SUs PassFor students' unions – briefings, recordings and training.Free briefingThe Monday Briefing, Lite edition – free.
About Us+
About WonkhePeopleOur partnersWrite for WonkheContact us
Events
Latest+
Explore the whole archiveDataWonkhe researchLong readsAnalysisCommentWonk Corner
Podcast
SUs
Monday 28 September 2026Home of the higher education debate

Copyright © 2026 Thesis House Ltd.

Wonkhe is published by Thesis House Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no. 08784934), 31–35 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TE.

  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Jim Dickinson

Jim Dickinson

Jim is an Associate Editor (SUs) at Wonkhe
Wonk Corner26/06/26 · 00:18
Wonk Corner|26/06/26 · 00:18

A new minimum English language requirement for student finance

I regret to inform you that the Skills Minister has been writing letters again.

Jim Dickinson
Jim is an Associate Editor (SUs) at Wonkhe

This time the missive to VCs concerns “student outcomes and quality” – in other words, it’s (yet) another attempt to protect students from low-value courses.

It’s sadly not my excellent idea – that given most students borrow the money to pay tuition fees, we could protect them by writing off the remainder of their loan after say, oh I don’t know, 30 years.

Nor is it my other idea, which is introducing a regulatory system (paid for by students) designed to measure outcomes and identify if subject areas are Gold, Bronze, Silver or “require improvement”. And then deliver the improvement.

Instead, it’s another entry in the ongoing saga of “we have a problem with franchised-out private non-specialist HE, but for some reason keep trying to design complicated ways of tackling it that makes everyone feel rubbish”.

We’ve already had “make them register with OfS” and the botched “weekend delivery” omnishambles. The letter reminds us that to linking future inflationary fee uplifts to providers’ quality ratings is coming (making it harder for those providers to improve), that OfS may well choke expansion in Bronze providers, and that DfE is hoping for time in Parliament to limit the growth of some courses that lead to poor earnings returns at some providers.

All of these things really seem to be about franchised-out private non-specialist HE without saying so. And so is the latest wheeze:

We intend to consult in the autumn on a new minimum English language requirement for student finance, to provide greater confidence that recipients are able to benefit from their course.

God forbid that someone somewhere looks at things like what we’d love students to study, or where we’d like them to do so. Just imagine if someone looked at the obscene profits still being made by providers using the loan system as a cashpoint. They could also ask themselves what the current incentives are driving recruitment behaviour and tackle them.

My guess is that graduates of the big business courses franchised expansion are starting to show up (or, actually, not show up) in DfE’s student loan repayment models – which as we’ve discussed before means writing off more of years of loans all in one year.

If true – and we may know more in July – the Treasury will be demanding action from DfE. Sadly, this fiddling about appears to be the best it can do. Which is odd, because it clearly isn't the best DfE can do. It just won't do it in HE.