• About Us
    • About Wonkhe
    • Our subscriptions
    • People
    • Our partners
    • Pitch an article
    • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Latest
    • Explore the whole archive
    • Podcasts
    • Data
    • Wonkhe research
    • Long reads
    • Analysis
    • Comment
    • Wonk Corner
  • Jobs
    • Live jobs
    • Jobs posting & prices
  • Subscription
    • Briefings sign up
    • Subscription services
    • Check my sub status
    • Daily Briefing
    • Wonkhe SUs
    • Policy Update
  • SUs
    • SUs HOME
    • SUs LOGIN
    • ADD NEW SUs USER
    • EXPLAINERS INDEX
    • WEBINARS INDEX
    • LATEST SUs BLOGS
    • SU STRATEGIES
  • Wonkhe Bluesky
  • Wonkhe Bluesky
  • icon-comments 1
  • About Us
    • About Wonkhe
    • Our subscriptions
    • People
    • Our partners
    • Pitch an article
    • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Latest
    • Explore the whole archive
    • Podcasts
    • Data
    • Wonkhe research
    • Long reads
    • Analysis
    • Comment
    • Wonk Corner
  • Jobs
    • Live jobs
    • Jobs posting & prices
  • Subscription
    • Briefings sign up
    • Subscription services
    • Check my sub status
    • Daily Briefing
    • Wonkhe SUs
    • Policy Update
  • SUs
    • SUs HOME
    • SUs LOGIN
    • ADD NEW SUs USER
    • EXPLAINERS INDEX
    • WEBINARS INDEX
    • LATEST SUs BLOGS
    • SU STRATEGIES
  • Wonkhe Bluesky
Wonkhe old book thesis
Image: Shutterstock
This article is more than 4 years old
by David Kernohan
Analysis
21/07/21

What the public believes about universities, and why

Some widely held ideas about higher education have a surprising history, even though they shape policy and perceptions in 2021. David Kernohan checks his references.
  • icon-comments 1
  • icon-share

Share

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
David Kernohan
David Kernohan

David Kernohan

Deputy Editor

by David Kernohan
staff
21/10/14

David Kernohan is Deputy Editor of Wonkhe

Tags

  • Freedom of speech
  • Politics
  • public engagement
David Kernohan

David Kernohan is Deputy Editor of Wonkhe

Tags

  • Freedom of speech
  • Politics
  • public engagement

It’s been a very long time since I thought about the Black Papers, and I’m not sure whether to thank UPP, HEPI, and Public First for the reminder.

Kingsley Amis wasn’t just a novelist and poet – he taught English at University College Swansea (now Swansea University) for about a decade, writing archetypal campus novel Lucky Jim during this period. But that wasn’t all he wrote – towards the end of his tenure he settled into carping about mass education and making arguments for elitism as a motivating principle for what I guess I can now call skills planning.

“MORE MEANS WORSE” is the old saw that UPP’s Richard Brabner and HEPI’s Nick Hillman reach for in the introduction to a survey of public attitudes to higher education (of 2,011 adults recruited via online panels and weighted by age and sex, region of residence, and social grade – carried out by Public First). It comes from a 1960 Kingsley Amis Encounter piece entitled “Lone Voices”.

A Swansea academic writes

To be fair, it’s a class above your usual letter from an aggrieved academic in terms of style though you do have to read a fair few words about how terrible the 50s and Americanisation are before you get to the money-shot, as it were, on how more graduates means worse graduates. But this isn’t just one disillusioned history man (to mix literary metaphors for the moment) railing against his advancing years and declining proclivities – it’s an early signal of a trend in public thought around education policy diametrically opposed to CP Snow’s techno-optimism (The Two Cultures – via maybe the Robbins Report) of the same time. We had to wait till 1969 for this strand of thought to fully enter the mainstream – after Wilson’s “white heat” technological revolution had subsided a bit – via the Black Papers (Brian Cox, AE Dyson, Angus Maude, Rhodes Boyson and – yes – Kingsley Amis).

Though that’s quite the political spectrum – including an LGBT rights pioneer and a noted homophobe and corporal punishment enthusiast – the papers (actually a series of special issues of Critical Quarterly published to initial furore and waning influence) could be seen as the flowering of a traditionalist romantic utilitarianism that has percolated through popular thinking on education ever since. Broadly characterised – education used to be better (these progressive ideas are terrible!), only people who could really benefit from it got the good stuff, this gave us the stratified society and promoted the natural leadership that led us to the Suez Crisis – it’s still recognisable, and influential in 2021.

Future echoes

Why do I say that? Well, results from the HEPI/UPP survey show the ideas of these mid-century academics and public intellectuals as significant in the general public perceptions of higher education now. Though the thrust of the argument then was pro-grammar schools but only for the best – we could see university now as the grammar school writ large.

Twenty-seven percent of our sample feels that there should be a smaller proportion of the population going to university than there currently is. That’s not the plurality (36 per cent think the current proportion is right), but just 17 per cent support expansion. The likelihood of holding this view increases by age (up to 43 per cent in the over 65s!) and right wing voting habits (Conservative in 2019 36 per cent, Brexit Party in 2019 46 per cent). There’s not a great difference by education level, though the opinion tends to be more widely held where neither parent attended university.

[Full screen]

We don’t get the cross tabulations that might tell us why with respect to other views – the characteristics splits (older, Conservative) suggest to me that belief in the virtues of a smaller sector has become a received opinion. Interesting the lasting impacts that the opinions of a bunch of academics and writers 70 years ago has had.

Definitions in data

Arguably, the current loggerheads at which the sector and government sit is based on a similarly precarious commonplace as free speech debates tend to be. Canny politicians and also Gavin Williamson know that leaning in to stuff everyone knows (“exams are the best way to assess potential”, for christssake!) is the best way to push through pet policies.

Take, for example, “decolonisation”. A perfectly fair and reasonable academic term for the process of accounting for and listening to the voices of those who suffered and continue to suffer at the sharp end of history and politics. As the survey notes, if you ask the public how it feels about “decolonisation” you get 29 per cent who disagree with the idea (our instinctual culture warriors) plus 16 per cent who don’t have a clue what you are talking about and 33 per cent who don’t feel they know enough either way.

Flip that to asking about curricula “allowing students to study about (sic) people, events, materials and subjects from around the world, and ensure that all groups are represented fairly and discussed in an even-handed way” and you get 65 per cent of the public in favour. It’s maybe not quite as stark as the data paints it – “decolonisation” is said to somehow mean actively “removing material” which reflects a “western dominated” view of the world. That’s what Michelle Donelan thinks decolonisation is, but it isn’t what anyone who actually wants to do it thinks – and it’s a debate that’s been in play since round about the time Amis was writing in the late 50s, so we can’t really blame novelty.

[Full screen]

The appetite for higher study

We can apply this same idea around wording to other responses about the use of universities. The “other people’s children” meme – the idea that too many people go to university, but you and your children are not the “too many” – is a powerful one, and there is more evidence for it’s prevalence here. A clear 48 per cent would definitely or probably want their children to go to university – just 23 per cent feel that it is unimportant for a person to get a university degree.

[Full screen]

A third of those who did not go to university would want to do so if they were leaving school now, two thirds of those who did attend university would still do so. Those who did not go to university themselves would (narrowly) not want their children to go, but there is not much in it.

[Full screen]

Parental university experience is a valuable predictor here – just eight per cent of those where both parents went to university (twenty per cent where one parent did) would not want to go now. And just 19 per cent of the sample feel that university is a waste of time – and on this question both parental university experience and the age gradient slants the other way. If you think that this seems curious you are right to do so.

[Full screen]

There is a temptation in survey analysis to assume that a set of responses from a person is equivalent to a coherent philosophy – this could not be further from the truth. People respond to survey questions largely instinctually – wording and phraseology is hugely influential, and even an echo of a common idea can make a huge difference. That’s not to say that framing changes everything, not even the Nudge Unit believes that, but survey design is an art rather than a science.

I don’t know whether culture wars end when we agree on a common vocabulary, I don’t know whether a stable, neutral ontology will stop government attacks on the sector or vice-versa. But I do know that memes – even pensionable age ones like the curious conceptualisation of education in the Black Papers – are stubborn and long lasting mental hooks into the mind of the nation.

Share

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • icon-comments 1
  • icon-share

Share

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)

fest Festival side

TFOHE25_Website_Column_1000x1680_Book@2x
TFOHE25_Website_Column_1000x1680_Book@2x

View here
by Mark Leach
featured message
19/05/23

post list Latest articles

Wonkhe_WonkheShow_Social_Blue@2x
Image: Wonkhe

Podcast: Mergers, reshuffle

by Team Wonkhe
Podcasts
12/09/25
wonkhe-admit-one
Image: Shutterstock

High tariff providers may be making medium tariff offers

by David Kernohan
Data
12/09/25
Untitled
Image: Shutterstock

We cannot address the AI challenge by acting as though assessment is a standalone activity

by Duna Sabri
Comment
12/09/25
we4jgtfioewhrugiooe
Image: Shutterstock

Comparing students with the general population is misleading when it comes to suicide

by Robert Abrahart
Comment
12/09/25
181clarksononcork
Image: Shutterstock

Higher education postcard: matriculation

by Hugh Jones
Comment
12/09/25
Shutterstock_2375488919
Image: Shutterstock

Falling mature student numbers requires policy action

by Rachel Hewitt
Comment
11/09/25
wonkhe-merge
Image: Shutterstock

The first multi-university group arrives

by Mark Leach
Comment
10/09/25
efgnkwjerfghnjkwe
Image: Shutterstock

Academic coaching is data-driven support for students in the dark

by Buxi Duan
Comment
10/09/25
Shutterstock_2408684007
Image: Shutterstock

There’s no magic wand for student wellbeing

by Ben Lewis
Comment
9/09/25
ewgiufvghwuier
Image: Shutterstock

Back to the future for the TEF? Back to school for OfS?

by Paul Ashwin
Comment
9/09/25
rating

1 Comment
Oldest
Newest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
albertswright
4 years ago

I remember reading about the Black Papers at the time in the late 1960’s when around 5% of the population went to a university but would guess that fewer than 2% of the population actually read the Black Papers, so I wonder how much influence they had. Today, with around 50% of the population going to university I am not surprised at the results of the survey nor at the relatively high percentage of “don’t knows”. As for what the results “mean”, or suggest we should do, I am even more reserved. As “Attending University” is such a “wide church”… Read more »

Reply

Related articles

Wonkhe_WonkheShow_Social_Blue@2x
Image: Wonkhe

Podcast: Year ahead, international, governance

by Team Wonkhe
Podcasts
5/09/25
Refreshing,Green,Creamy,Nettle,Soup,In,A,White,Bowl,On
Image: Shutterstock

What’s coming up for HE policy in 2025–26

by Debbie McVitty
Comment
1/09/25
Access,Point,Through,The,Dry,Stone,Wall,Leading,To,A
Image: Shutterstock

Building collective capacity to defend and celebrate HE

by Team Wonkhe
Comment
1/09/25
AAA
Image: Wonkhe

Podcast: AI and jobs, provider closure, UCAS figures

by Team Wonkhe
Podcasts
17/07/25
Shutterstock_2393375781
Image: Shutterstock

Embed! How to save the civic agenda

by James Coe
Comment
14/07/25
AAA
Image: Wonkhe

Podcast: Student experience, LLE, civic

by Team Wonkhe
Podcasts
10/07/25
wfuiohwuiogfwe
Image: Shutterstock

One year on from the election, Labour is losing the student vote

by Myles Hanlon
Comment
4/07/25
AAA
Image: Wonkhe

Podcast: International, student leaders, metascience

by Team Wonkhe
Podcasts
4/07/25

Copyright © 2025 Wonkhe Ltd.

Company Number: 08784934

Wonkhe Bluesky

Wonkhe Ltd, 31-35 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TE

  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Wonkhe Mondays

By submitting you agree to our terms and conditions