Subscribe

Briefings

Daily BriefingEvery weekday · by 8amHigher education's essential morning read.Monday BriefingWeekly · MondaysThe full week ahead in HE policy.Friday ReviewWeekly · Friday lunchtimesWhat you need to know about the week just gone.

Newsletters & more

HE InfluencePolitics and policy and the way the sector is seen.HE CounselNewGovernance, law and regulation for anyone following legal developments.Policy RadarThe monthly live policy briefing – watch live or catch the replay on the portal.

Services

Wonkhe PassFull access for your whole institution.Wonkhe SUs PassFor students' unions – briefings, recordings and training.Free briefingThe Monday Briefing, Lite edition – free.
About Us+
About WonkhePeopleOur partnersWrite for WonkheContact us
Events
Latest+
Explore the whole archiveDataWonkhe researchLong readsAnalysisCommentWonk Corner
Podcast
SUs
Monday 28 September 2026Home of the higher education debate

Copyright © 2026 Thesis House Ltd.

Wonkhe is published by Thesis House Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no. 08784934), 31–35 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TE.

  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Student finance 2012: independent taskforce to separate facts from politics

Today, alongside Martin Lewis of moneysavingexpert.com, I am proud to be launching a major campaign – independent of government – to tackle the myths and misconceptions surrounding the true costs of higher education from 2012. There can be no doubt that the trebling of tuition fees to £9,000 is having a major impact on the decisions taken by potential students and their families. Writing for the Guardian two months ago, I warned that “confusion around the new [tuition fees and student finance] arrangements presents a real risk that students may be deterred in the absence of the facts on fees”. Earlier this week, my fears were confirmed by a Universities UK poll showing that more than half of parents felt that they had been given insufficient information about the new student finance arrangements.

This article is more than 10 years old

Comment|17/06/11
Wes Streeting

Wes Streeting

Wes Streeting is Labour MP for Ilford North and was President of the National Union of Students from 2008 to 2010.
Tags
  • Fees and Funding
Wes Streeting
Wes Streeting is Labour MP for Ilford North and was President of the National Union of Students from 2008 to 2010.

Today, alongside Martin Lewis of moneysavingexpert.com, I am proud to be launching a major campaign – independent of government – to tackle the myths and misconceptions surrounding the true costs of higher education from 2012.

There can be no doubt that the trebling of tuition fees to £9,000 is having a major impact on the decisions taken by potential students and their families. Writing for the Guardian two months ago, I warned that “confusion around the new [tuition fees and student finance] arrangements presents a real risk that students may be deterred in the absence of the facts on fees”. Earlier this week, my fears were confirmed by a Universities UK poll showing that more than half of parents felt that they had been given insufficient information about the new student finance arrangements.

Parents are not alone in worrying about the new system. On Tuesday evening, I was talking to newly qualified teachers on the Teach First programme, all of whom were concerned about what kind of advice they should be giving to young people thinking about their post-16 options. My own work with students through the Helena Kennedy Foundation, which includes some of the most disadvantaged students in Britain’s colleges, confirms that the prospect of fees at £9,000 is making so many students seriously rethink their ambitions.

Too many of the basic facts about the new system are being lost in the political debate about the merits of the system. A vague utterance from any minister is enough to provoke a barrage of abuse about broken promises, eye watering debts and the risk of students being put off. That’s why Martin and I, backed by NUS, universities, UCAS and student money advisors, are taking matters into our own hands. Our new, snappily named, Independent Taskforce on Student Finance Information, will lay out clear, unbiased information telling students, families, teachers and advisors everything they need to know about the new system. We’ll be working with a range of partners to get the information across using the best that the web, best-of-breed apps, video print, speakers, ambassadors and every other way we can think of to allow people to make informed decisions about higher education.

As critics of the new system, Martin and I are well placed to ensure that potential students get access to clear, unbiased information about the student finance from 2012.  We are grateful for the blessing of ministers, but we are not in the business of selling the Government’s fees policy. Quite the opposite; we wish to separate the facts from the politics.

Facts may not be enough to prevent students from being deterred from higher education by higher fees. Last week I was in Nottingham, meeting sixth formers from three schools in Ashfield. Many of them were very well informed about fees, loans, grants, repayment thresholds and debt write off. They questions they were asking were not about affordability, but about whether university was really worth it.

If students are deterred – as I expect many will be – by the realities of the new system, the Government will need to think again. But the tragedy of students, particularly from poorer backgrounds, being deterred because of myths and misconceptions is one that can be easily avoided if we all play our part.

Martin Lewis has already published 20 key facts about the new system on his website at moneysavingexpert.com. Spread the word far and wide. There’s more to follow and lots to do. All of us – supporters and critics alike – must play our part.

Related articles

Let’s not confuse institutional prestige with national priority

David Mba | Comment | 28/09/26

Getting into university isn’t enough

Antony Moss | Comment | 28/09/26

Aerial image of Liverpool city centre

If universities aren’t a priority, at least give them certainty

Ian Turgoose | Comment | 28/09/26

Students are working more than ever. Or are they?

Jim Dickinson | Comment | 25/09/26

Image of the Singapore skyline

Lessons in collaboration from Singapore

James Coe | Comment | 25/09/26

Image of a postcard of the University of Birmingham bell tower on a cork board

Higher education postcard: Old Joe

Hugh Jones | Comment | 25/09/26

Comments · 1

New comments will come back with sign-in later this year.

John Holmwood · 17 Jun 2011

Of course, HEFCE is promoting a Key Information Set to be provided for each course, using information for the National Student Survey and information on incomes six-months from graduation. This data is highly misleading for students and does not allow the comparisons and rank orderings that are generated from it. See my blog at:

http://exquisitelife.researchresearch.com/exquisite_life/2011/02/code-of-practice-needed-to-halt-degree-course-mis-selling-.html#more .

In addition, HEPI have calculated that, under the proposed loan arrangements, the extra cost of the higher fee of £9000 (when compared with the a fee of £6000) for ‘low earners’ (ie those who earn sufficient to begin to repay, but in the lower category of earnings)is less than £300. For this they would benefit from significantly greater investment in their courses. See: http://www.hepi.ac.uk/478-1905/HEPI-publishes-analysis-of-Government-concessions-on-HE-funding-and-student-finance.html