Stephanie Mckendry and Matson Lawrence of the University of Strathclyde take a look at the experiences of trans, non-binary and gender diverse people in higher education and set out how we can help.
This article is more than 8 years old

The poor experiences of those who identify as trans, non-binary or gender diverse is being increasingly documented.
Stonewall’s most recent Trans Report (2017) on life in the UK paints a picture of harassment and discrimination for many whose gender identity differs from the gender and sex they were assigned at birth (trans men and trans women, for example) and for those who experience their gender outside of the binary (non-binary, agender or genderqueer people, for example). In their survey, Stonewall found that, in the last year, 12% had been physically attacked by a colleague or customer, and more than a third of trans students (36%) had experienced negative comments or behaviour from staff. A quarter of trans people had experienced homelessness, and just under half (48%) did not feel comfortable using public toilets through fear of discrimination or harassment.
As researchers with backgrounds in access and equality we wanted to better understand what life was like for trans and gender diverse people in the further and higher education sectors. We undertook the TransEdu project to examine the experiences of applicants, students and staff in Scotland’s colleges and universities. Backed by the Scottish Funding Council (SFC), the project aimed to baseline current policy and practice, and undertake empirical research with trans and gender diverse people in tertiary education in order to inform institutional policy and procedure, including Equality Outcomes, Gender Action Plans, Equality Impact Assessments and ethical and statutory obligations. Using an action research methodology, we mapped current practice in colleges and universities, undertook documentary analysis, and surveyed 157 applicants, students and staff, with participants from every higher education institution and two-thirds of colleges in Scotland. We also undertook 20 in-depth interviews.
From textual analysis of free text responses within the survey and interviews, eight dominant themes emerged. These included:
Safety – a significant number of people were concerned about their personal safety on campus, experiencing hostility and overt transphobia.
Learning and teaching issues – poor experiences particularly in relation to group work, attitudes of staff and the perceived “laddishness” of certain disciplines, the dearth of curriculum pertaining to trans and gender diversity issues in many healthcare and professional programmes and negative experiences on placement.
Complexities and intersections – the need to attend to the specific experiences of those with mental health conditions or disabilities, which are more prevalent among this group than the wider population. Issues of estrangement, isolation and financial precarity were common.
Having to be educators – the vast majority of interviewees and survey respondents expressed frustration and disappointment around the lack of trans awareness or understanding of gender diversity. Individuals, particularly staff members, had to educate those around them in order to receive support and any sense of understanding. While some were happy to participate in campaigns and instigate activities, all agreed primary responsibility for change and training had to be led by the institution.
Othering – administrative difficulties, a lack of gender neutral facilities and sports opportunities, and misgendering (using the incorrect pronoun, for example) may all individually appear to be isolated, perhaps minor, incidents. Taken together, however, they create a hostile and unwelcoming environment for trans and gender diverse people. Conversely, even minor efforts to promote inclusion made a real difference to people’s experiences.
While it was clear that there were many challenges for people - experiences that are likely to be mirrored across the UK - there is much that can be done at an individual, departmental and institutional level.
In particular, we recommend that designated named contacts are trained and publicised as an approachable and accessible single point of contact for staff and students who wish to discuss matters and seek advice on study or work issues related to their gender identity or trans status. We also recommend the development of a specific gender diversity policy; clear online information outlining the rights and support gender diverse people can expect from their employer or place of study; trans inclusive curricula projects; and celebrations of gender diversity through event calendars and campaigns.
Even simple gestures of recognition – such as adding your pronouns to your email signature or putting up posters that celebrate gender diversity – can have a significant impact upon trans staff and students, and upon the wider university community, particularly when accompanied by wider work for systemic and structural institutional change.
To help those supporting trans and gender diverse students, staff and their families, we have developed a suite of resources, guidance and case studies published on our website, while also drawing together the resources that already exist across and beyond our sectors. There is much to be done to improve support, but there are many examples of effective practice and, we believe, a real desire to promote gender diversity and trans inclusion within the sector.
New comments will come back with sign-in later this year.
Soil System Sciences | Gender equity in (Soil) Science · 7 Mar 2021
[…] underrepresented and face gender bias in science while we are only starting to learn about the experience of trans and gender diverse individuals. Positive disclaimer: The situation *is* […]
Roundup Post: October Edition | The Activist Classroom · 2 Nov 2021
[…] undertaken by Stephanie Mckendry and Matson Lawrence of the University of Strathclyde circa 2017: “Improving the experiences of trans and gender diverse staff in higher education” keeps our eyes on the key issue, even while Twitter catches fire with yet another zero-sum […]

Jim Dickinson | Analysis | 4/09/26
Ola Thomson | Analysis | 27/08/26

Wendy Ashall | Analysis | 26/08/26

Jim Dickinson | Analysis | 25/08/26

David Kernohan | Analysis | 12/08/26

Beth Hocking | Analysis | 23/07/26