• About Us
    • About Wonkhe
    • Our subscriptions
    • People
    • Our partners
    • Pitch an article
    • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Latest
    • Explore the whole archive
    • Podcasts
    • Data
    • Wonkhe research
    • Long reads
    • Analysis
    • Comment
    • Wonk Corner
  • Jobs
    • Live jobs
    • Jobs posting & prices
  • Subscription
    • Our subscriptions
    • Wonkhe Pass
    • Wonkhe Mondays
    • Wonkhe Daily
    • Wonkhe SUs
    • Wonkhe Briefing
  • SUs
    • SUs HOME
    • SUs LOGIN
    • SUBSCRIPTION BENEFITS
    • BRIEFINGS FOR SUs
    • WEBINAR ARCHIVE
    • FREE SPEECH
    • LATEST ARTICLES
    • ADD NEW USER
  • icon-comments
  • About Us
    • About Wonkhe
    • Our subscriptions
    • People
    • Our partners
    • Pitch an article
    • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Latest
    • Explore the whole archive
    • Podcasts
    • Data
    • Wonkhe research
    • Long reads
    • Analysis
    • Comment
    • Wonk Corner
  • Jobs
    • Live jobs
    • Jobs posting & prices
  • Subscription
    • Our subscriptions
    • Wonkhe Pass
    • Wonkhe Mondays
    • Wonkhe Daily
    • Wonkhe SUs
    • Wonkhe Briefing
  • SUs
    • SUs HOME
    • SUs LOGIN
    • SUBSCRIPTION BENEFITS
    • BRIEFINGS FOR SUs
    • WEBINAR ARCHIVE
    • FREE SPEECH
    • LATEST ARTICLES
    • ADD NEW USER
This article is more than 1 year old
by Stephen Meek
Comment
5/02/21

Does good policy need good politics or good evidence?

Stephen Meek reflects on a year when the relationship between research and policy making has mattered more than ever.
This article is more than 1 year old
by Stephen Meek
Comment
5/02/21
shutterstock_1592903767
Image: Shutterstock
Stephen-Meek
Image: Shutterstock

Stephen Meek

Director

by Jim Dickinson
staff
25/10/19

Stephen Meek is the Director of the Institute for Policy and Engagement at the University of Nottingham.

Tags

  • KEF
  • policy
  • Politics
  • public engagement
  • Research
Stephen Meek

Stephen Meek is the Director of the Institute for Policy and Engagement at the University of Nottingham.

Tags

  • KEF
  • policy
  • Politics
  • public engagement
  • Research

Are politicians being led by the science, guided by the science, or ignoring the science?

What is the right way to align policy decisions that literally have life and death consequences and need to be taken now when the evidence base is evolving and incomplete?

This issue is of course not new, even though the stakes and visibility have rarely been so high. It has been a growing focus for governments, universities and funders for some years, in the UK at least driven by a recognition that way research was rewarded and academic careers built did not encourage this sort of connection.

In the UK and elsewhere translation of research into policy is now an activity supported and rewarded. But making the connection work is not just an issue of getting the financial incentives right.

A “broker”, someone to facilitate the connection has been seen as part of the answer, with universities establishing policy facing functions and Institutes like the one I lead at Nottingham.

The new head of UKRI, Ottoline Leyser, has talked about the importance of this role in her vision of a healthy research landscape.

This was the driver for the creation of the Universities Policy Engagement Network (UPEN), which it has been my privilege to chair for the last 18 months. Back in 2018, with Gavin Costigan as chair and driving force, UPEN brought together policy facing functions at 10 universities to share good practice and be a cross-university voice with whom policymakers could engage.

Since then our membership has grown to 75, with members drawn from all four nations and every variety of higher education institution, and with active participation not just from universities but also from government departments, funders and Parliament.

Priorities

UPEN’s work has concentrated on three things.

The first has been building the sector – sharing good practice across functions often developing from scratch and hugely varied in size and shape, from impact managers who have policy impact as a portion of their job, to the large policy institutes in Kings, Cambridge and elsewhere. We are all learning, and on the basis that a rising tide floats all boats we see a mutual benefit in building sectoral capacity, even if the incentive structures created by the REF mean we are also in competition.

The second has been to provide a “one stop shop” for policymakers to draw on more easily expertise in universities. As I know from my time working in Whitehall, it is often easier to round up the usual suspects than to identify new voices, particularly if you are working at pace.

By using UPEN as a vehicle to share calls for insight, policymakers know that the call will be sent to people whose job it is to put it in front of the right academics, and to support those academics to provide their insight in a form that policymakers can use.

The third ambition has been not just to respond to make the status quo function better, but to critically reflect on and reshape the exchange between policy makers and researchers.

Last year we published a paper outlining UPEN members’ experiences engaging with Government Departments’ Areas of Research Interest (ARI). We argue ARI should be a starting point for a dialogue to understand priorities and shape research questions rather than as a one-off, one-way list of questions to answer.

This has led to a number of promising collaborations with a number of departments. We were also very pleased to be able to work with the Government Office for Science and their ESRC funded ARI fellows Professor Annette Boaz and Dr Kathryn Oliver on the “Rebuilding a Resilient Britain” project. We helped them identify and convene researchers from across the UK to develop a set of ARI looking thematically and cross-government at the challenges of recovering from the pandemic, the results of which can be found on our website.

We have also been looking at EDI issues in policy engagement, exploring the extent to which current (or perhaps better, pre-pandemic) modes of engagement create obstacles which mean policymakers aren’t benefiting from the full range of expertise in UK universities. We will be saying more on this in the coming months.

Understanding

The last year has been one in which the enormous contribution the UK’s universities make nationally and globally has been demonstrated time and time again, most obviously but not just in the development of therapies and vaccines to help manage the pandemic.

Hopefully one consequence of this is a better understanding in both government and universities of how evidence can be used to make better policy (there isn’t space to reflect here on what these might be but here are some thoughts from May last year).

A strong cadre of people whose role it is to understand, navigate and critically reflect on the interface between the academy and policymaking is going to be vital to making this relationship work. UPEN, under its new chair Professor Matt Flinders of the University of Sheffield, working with others such as www.cape.ac.uk and the new ESRC funded Policy Observatories, will play a significant role in this.

Share

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • icon-comments
  • icon-share

Share

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)

post list Latest articles

Shutterstock_304007801
Image: Shutterstock

What should higher education learn from the Natasha Abrahart case?

by Jim Dickinson
Analysis
20/05/22

Distinctiveness, citizens, people and place: Jeremy Miles on HE in Wales

by Jim Dickinson
Comment
20/05/22
wonkhe-u-turn
Image: Shutterstock

Unconditional offers? Low entry qualifications are now the concern

by David Kernohan
Data
20/05/22

Podcast: Wokery, LEO, grade inflation

by Team Wonkhe
Podcasts
20/05/22
Shutterstock_1702475611
Image: Shutterstock

How to help international students bounce back from Covid-19

by Alina Schartner
Comment
20/05/22
shutterstock_1155725137
Image: Shutterstock

The role of governance in addressing grade inflation

by Simon Meacher
Comment
19/05/22
shutterstock_1058170628
Image: Shutterstock

How can universities provide enterprising solutions for small business?

by Robert Crammond
Comment
19/05/22
Wonkhe-postcard-lincoln
Image: Hugh Jones

Higher Education Postcard: University of Lincoln

by Hugh Jones
Comment
19/05/22
Wonkhe-unicorn-stars
Image: Shutterstock

Do marginal gains approaches in universities fuel REF myths?

by Órla Meadhbh Murray
Analysis
18/05/22
wonkhe-some-trees
Image: Shutterstock

Climate action must support social justice

by Susan Lea
Comment
18/05/22

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Related articles

wonkhe-pie-changing-allocations
Image: Shutterstock

The history and future of QR funding for research

by Dave Radcliffe
Analysis
17/05/22
00029341
Image: IKON

The government is “disengaging” from NUS. Does it matter?

by Jim Dickinson
Analysis
16/05/22
wonkhe-arts
Image: Shutterstock

REF 2021 demonstrated the power of arts and humanities research

by James Coe
Comment
16/05/22
wonkhe-phd-gown
Image: Shutterstock

How REF can help PhD applicants

by Mark Bennett
Comment
16/05/22

Podcast: REF results, Queen’s speech, Access all areas

by Team Wonkhe
Podcasts
13/05/22
shutterstock_2143197371
Image: Shutterstock

We need to talk about REF and early career researchers

by Sunday Blake
Comment
12/05/22
shutterstock_1140456245
Image: Shutterstock

The REF is dead, long live the REF

by Elizabeth Gadd
Comment
12/05/22
Wonkhe-REF-outputs-IKON-scaled
Image: Ikon

Understanding the REF 2021 results

by David Kernohan
Analysis
12/05/22

Copyright © 2022 Wonkhe Ltd.

Company Number: 08784934

Wonkhe Ltd, Lower Third Floor Evelyn Suite, Quantum House,

22-24 Red Lion Court, London, United Kingdom, EC4A 3EB

  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Wonkhe Mondays

By submitting you agree to our terms and conditions

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.