• About Us
    • About Wonkhe
    • Our subscriptions
    • People
    • Our partners
    • Pitch an article
    • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Latest
    • Explore the whole archive
    • Podcasts
    • Data
    • Wonkhe research
    • Long reads
    • Analysis
    • Comment
    • Wonk Corner
  • Jobs
    • Live jobs
    • Jobs posting & prices
  • Subscription
    • Briefings sign up
    • Subscription services
    • Check my sub status
    • Daily Briefing
    • Wonkhe SUs
    • Policy Update
  • SUs
    • SUs HOME
    • SUs LOGIN
    • ADD NEW SUs USER
    • EXPLAINERS INDEX
    • WEBINARS INDEX
    • LATEST SUs BLOGS
    • SU STRATEGIES
  • Wonkhe Bluesky
  • Wonkhe Bluesky
  • icon-comments 2
  • About Us
    • About Wonkhe
    • Our subscriptions
    • People
    • Our partners
    • Pitch an article
    • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Latest
    • Explore the whole archive
    • Podcasts
    • Data
    • Wonkhe research
    • Long reads
    • Analysis
    • Comment
    • Wonk Corner
  • Jobs
    • Live jobs
    • Jobs posting & prices
  • Subscription
    • Briefings sign up
    • Subscription services
    • Check my sub status
    • Daily Briefing
    • Wonkhe SUs
    • Policy Update
  • SUs
    • SUs HOME
    • SUs LOGIN
    • ADD NEW SUs USER
    • EXPLAINERS INDEX
    • WEBINARS INDEX
    • LATEST SUs BLOGS
    • SU STRATEGIES
  • Wonkhe Bluesky
This article is more than 5 years old
by Paul Manners
Comment
13/05/20

Communicating research during Covid-19

Paul Manners breaks down best practice in engaging the public with research during the pandemic.
This article is more than 5 years old
by Paul Manners
Comment
13/05/20
Winter_2017_Cover_v5
Image: Ikon
Wonkhe_Paul_Manners
Wonkhe_Paul_Manners

Paul Manners

Director

by David Kernohan
staff
15/06/18

Paul Manners is the Director of the National Coordinating Centre for Public Engagement.

Tags

  • Communications
  • Covid-19
  • public engagement
  • Research
Paul Manners

Paul Manners is the Director of the National Coordinating Centre for Public Engagement.

Tags

  • Communications
  • Covid-19
  • public engagement
  • Research

Michael Gove’s infamous “we have had enough of experts” remark back in 2016 now rings very hollow.

There is great reassurance in seeing ministers flanked by experts at the daily press briefings as the government tries to manage the Covid-19 pandemic. The pandemic is creating a huge appetite for good scientific evidence and expertise.

Over the past few weeks, we have seen a range of researchers interviewed by the media, and many more are sharing their expertise with colleagues, family and friends. So what do we know about engaging with the public in a time of crisis? What advice should we offer researchers?

Think about your audience

A public health crisis on this scale has not been seen in our lifetimes, therefore many people are really frightened and anxious and this fear and worry inevitably affect how they “hear” what you are saying. Tuning into what those worries are and the questions people want answers to is a good place to start. Really listening to conversations – amongst friends, on Twitter, circulating on social media, and reflecting on how people are making sense of things will help you to work out how best to contribute.

Keep it simple

The situation is hugely complex with many unknowns and variables. The government has been careful to share the best scientific advice in bite-sized chunks, starting with the basics like hand hygiene (that feels like a long time ago now). In a situation like this it is important to make the knowledge actionable, enabling people to gain insights into what is happening, and take positive action to address the challenge.

Keep informed about the latest developments – the World Health Organisation (WHO) is a fantastic resource with the latest research logged here and regularly updated myth busters. UKRI’s Coronavirus: the science explained website lays out the evidence and facts about the virus and its control. Assume people are intelligent, but don’t assume they know the basics.

Choose your words carefully

The same words can mean different things to different people. Particularly high risk are words or phrases with technical meanings which people interpret using more colloquial frames of reference. Take the early debate over the extent to which the virus is “airborne” or not. As this article shows, scientists don’t agree what airborne actually means – so there is a real risk of misunderstanding. We need to think carefully about every word we use.

This extends to how we talk about the people involved too. The WHO provides excellent advice about how to avoid inadvertently stigmatising people who are being treated for Covid-19 by ill-chosen language (for instance talking about “cases” or “victims”).

Think about behaviour, not just facts

Whilst it can be tempting to believe that all people need is to be told the facts, and behaviour will follow, research and experience tells us that things are much more complicated than that. The so-called deficit model, where people are considered as empty vessels waiting to be filled with knowledge just doesn’t work.

If you want to change people’s behaviours you need to consider their emotional engagement with the topic in question, recognise that they have expertise and knowledge that informs their decision making which you are not privy to, and that they are strongly influenced by others. Ensure you are sharing simple, achievable actions to make it easy to get involved. Think about their peer networks, and the key influencers that they listen to, and ensure that you don’t assume what works for you works for anyone else.

Think of knowledge as something you create with people, rather than something you transmit

Educational theory can help you develop your communication. A really powerful idea is instructional scaffolding. Developed by Jerome Bruner in the late 1950s, it describes how experts can assist “apprentices” or novices by matching the level of support they offer to suit the cognitive potential of the learner. As the learner grasps the new knowledge, and internalises it, the scaffold falls away.

An example of a scaffold that has proved really powerful in engaging people with the science arose from the modelling contributed to by the team at Imperial College – leading to the worldwide focus on “flattening the curve”. The model vividly dramatised the underpinning dynamics of the public health catastrophe we were facing, with the speed of spread mapped against the capacity of health services. The visual and conceptual logic was obvious – and the ‘call to action’ incontrovertible.

Scaffolds like this make sense intellectually, can be easily visualised, verbalised and shared, and translate into collective action.

Show solidarity

Solidarity and global cooperation are needed to prevent further transmission and alleviate the concerns of communities. We need to recognise our role as scientists and as citizens, and show humanity and humility in our communications, perhaps by sharing sympathetic narratives, or stories that humanise the experiences of individuals or groups affected by Covid-19. And we need to communicate our support and encouragement for those who are on the frontlines of response to this outbreak (health care workers, volunteers, and community leaders)

Remember that every conversation counts. Some experts are commanding huge audiences through the media. Others are working much more locally, perhaps supporting local teachers with guidance on how to talk to their students about the virus. Don’t underestimate the value of those smaller, day-to-day conversations with family, friends and social networks.

Don’t over promise

While the temptation is to suggest science can provide the answers, there is a real risk of over-promising, and of losing public trust. A core principle of science is uncertainty. It is important to acknowledge how much is still unknowable about the pandemic, and that the science itself will change and perhaps lead to different answers as the situation develops. We need to talk about the process of science, to emphasise that we don’t have all the answers, but are cooperating globally to develop our understanding, on a day by day basis.

Listen as hard as you can

Above all, we need to listen. Seek advice on how to communicate – from colleagues, public engagement professionals, from agencies like the WHO and the Science Media Centre. Resist the temptation to always slip into “expert” mode and to offer answers and solutions. As important is to tune into how people are making sense of the pandemic and of the multiple sources of information around them. The better we understand this, the better we will be able to explain, and build scaffolds that are meaningful and practical.

Given our current pandemic, experts are more needed than ever before. But expert knowledge is not enough on its own. Our skills in engagement play a crucial role in ensuring our contribution is as meaningful, trustworthy and ethical as possible – and that we are maximising the value of research during an unprecedented collective crisis.

Share

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • icon-comments 2
  • icon-share

Share

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)

fest Festival side

TFOHE25_Website_Column_1000x1680_Book@2x
TFOHE25_Website_Column_1000x1680_Book@2x

View here
by Mark Leach
featured message
19/05/23

post list Latest articles

Magazine,Template,Collage,Of,Employee,Lady,Show,Document,With,Done
Image: Shutterstock

Universities struggle to recognise leadership beyond the academic template

by Nick Quinn
Comment
15/07/25
Goldsmith,Makes,Gold,Necklace,melting,Gold,By,High,Fire,Voltage,In
Image: Shutterstock

Creative higher education isn’t a skills pipeline, it’s a cultural force

by Randall Whittaker
Comment
15/07/25
Shutterstock_2393375781
Image: Shutterstock

Embed! How to save the civic agenda

by James Coe
Comment
14/07/25
wonkhe-foundation-building
Image: Shutterstock

How funding policy has affected foundation year provision

by David Kernohan
Analysis
13/07/25
Drug,Addiction,Concept,And,Substance,Dependence,As,A,Junkie,Symbol
Image: Shutterstock

It is high time higher education adopted a harm reduction approach to drug use among students

by David Hillier
Comment
11/07/25
178cambridgecorpuschristioncork
Image: Hugh Jones

Higher education postcard: Corpus Christi, Cambridge

by Hugh Jones
Comment
11/07/25
AAA
Image: Wonkhe

Podcast: Student experience, LLE, civic

by Team Wonkhe
Podcasts
10/07/25
Shutterstock_1728102091
Image: Shutterstock

The LLE finally gets a Labour overhaul

by Michael Salmon
Policy Watch
10/07/25
wonkhe-swimming-pool
Image: Shutterstock

National Student Survey 2025

by David Kernohan
Data
9/07/25
Thermometer,Showing,High,Temperature,Is,On,Orange,Background.,Heat,,Measuring
Image: Shutterstock

How can students’ module feedback help prepare for success in NSS?

by Helena Lim
Comment
9/07/25

2 responses to “Communicating research during Covid-19”

  1. Jan Green says:
    May 13 2020 at 12:16 pm

    A timely reminder – I’ve used the idea of a prop previously – scaffolding can be dismantled more gradually!

    Reply
  2. Anne adams says:
    May 19 2020 at 1:00 am

    All good points but I’d add in the importance of collecting and analysing local experiences to help understand behaviours in relation to national evidence bases. See observer article https://t.co/g7EjEpYPmj

    Reply

Leave a replyCancel reply

Related articles

Shutterstock_2159768735
Image: Shutterstock

REF panels must reflect the diversity of the UK higher education sector

by Louise Bracken
Comment
8/07/25
Shutterstock_2257182283
Image: Shutterstock

Defining the value of the UK’s international research partnerships

by Douglas Dowell
Comment
8/07/25
wonkhe-tree-growth-ecosystem
Image: Shutterstock

Research funding requires research capacity

by Anna Vignoles
Comment
7/07/25
Shutterstock_2482435561
Image: Shutterstock

How Labour’s 10-year health plan for England joins up with higher education and research

by James Coe
Policy Watch
4/07/25
Shutterstock_1993920137
Image: Shutterstock

It’s up to universities to make the industrial strategy a success

by James Coe
Comment
30/06/25
Shutterstock_742145041
Image: Shutterstock

The risk of unrepresentative REF returns hasn’t gone away

by Anton Muscatelli
Comment
26/06/25
wonkhe-solar-technician
Image: Shutterstock

Research and innovation in the industrial strategy

by David Kernohan
Policy Watch
24/06/25
Shutterstock_2499567629
Image: Shutterstock

Coaching can be a strategic act of research culture

by Saneeya Qureshi
Comment
20/06/25

Copyright © 2025 Wonkhe Ltd.

Company Number: 08784934

Wonkhe Bluesky

Wonkhe Ltd, 31-35 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TE

  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Wonkhe Mondays

By submitting you agree to our terms and conditions