This article is more than 2 years old
The OECD’s Education at a glance report for 2024 is out, and something can’t be right.
The chart that ought to strike fear into the heart of sector lobbyists in the report is this one, which suggests that the UK’s total expenditure per full-time equivalent student is beaten only by Luxemburg and the United States.

Even if you account for the figures being in dollars, I don’t think it feels like the sector is getting £25,669 per full-time equivalent student.
I’ve spent some time trying to work out the nature of the apparent discrepancy no to avail – and along the way have come across charts like this that can’t be right either:

It shows the annual average tuition fees charged by public institutions to national students, by level of education (2022/23), and that little dot in the top-right hand corner is supposedly England bachelors at £10,177 in pounds and pence. Eh?
Even if we do spend more than most, these are figures per FTE per year – not the cost per cohort in total. And so it’s always worth reminding ourselves about this chart – completion rates of full-time students who entered a bachelor’s (or equivalent level) programme, by gender and timeframe:

The bars are men and women’s completion rate by the theoretical duration of the programme, and the diamonds are the completion rate when you add on three years.
In other words if our cost per annum is higher, then it’s partly a feature of ramming more students through, and doing so at top speed. Add on those three years and our completion rate looks like very similar to the Swiss.
If their undergraduates take roughly twice as long as ours to complete a degree, even if the numbers in that first baffling chart are right, the cost per cohort suddenly starts to look like an absolute bargain.
Do we ram students though at top speed though? We must do. Here’s the mean age of undergraduates on entry across the OECD. We’re in the middle of the pack on 22:

But here’s the distribution for the average age on graduation from a bachelor’s, which suggests we have the youngest undergraduate graduates in the OECD other than Japan, jointly with Belgium and the Netherlands:

That top speed thing might be curtailing the spend per cohort, but it can’t be doing anything for the mental health of students, studying in a system that is evidently hopelessly unforgiving of those that need to slow down, take a break or experience a setback.
And for all the incessant talk of Blair’s 50 per cent target, we do seem to be slipping behind on the share of the population with a master’s. This is the expected probability of graduating for the first time from a master’s before the age of 35 (men, the women chart is almost identical) if current patterns are maintained:
