Subscribe

Briefings

Daily BriefingEvery weekday · by 8amHigher education's essential morning read.Monday BriefingWeekly · MondaysThe full week ahead in HE policy.Friday ReviewWeekly · Friday lunchtimesWhat you need to know about the week just gone.

Newsletters & more

HE InfluencePolitics and policy and the way the sector is seen.HE CounselNewGovernance, law and regulation for anyone following legal developments.Policy RadarThe monthly live policy briefing – watch live or catch the replay on the portal.

Services

Wonkhe PassFull access for your whole institution.Wonkhe SUs PassFor students' unions – briefings, recordings and training.Free briefingThe Monday Briefing, Lite edition – free.
About Us+
About WonkhePeopleOur partnersWrite for WonkheContact us
Events
Latest+
Explore the whole archiveDataWonkhe researchLong readsAnalysisCommentWonk Corner
Podcast
SUs
Thursday 24 September 2026Home of the higher education debate

Copyright © 2026 Thesis House Ltd.

Wonkhe is published by Thesis House Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no. 08784934), 31–35 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TE.

  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
Thesis
Jim Dickinson

Jim Dickinson

Jim is an Associate Editor (SUs) at Wonkhe

This article is more than 3 years old

Wonk Corner12/12/22 · 07:42
Tags
  • Access & WP

This article is more than 3 years old

Wonk Corner|12/12/22 · 07:42

Is the “way forward” an end to access and participation plans?

Always important to get rid of waste, if we can.

Jim Dickinson
Jim is an Associate Editor (SUs) at Wonkhe

This morning Thatcherite think tank “Conservative Way Forward” has a report out on how we can save taxpayers millions by “ending waste and division”.

Defunding Politically Motivated Campaigns first calculates that the sector is spending £30m on EDI staff. I make that a whopping 0.13 per cent of the sector’s spend on staff - a large chunk of which is funded by private sources who demand this kind of work.

Also included in its headline savings are Office for Students access and participation plans, which it argues are pushing higher education institutions towards introducing “politically motivated measures” like “decolonising the curriculum” and signing up to the Race Equality Charter.

Under the subhead “Over 250 higher education access and participation plans - £2.5 billion on race equality charters and decolonisation” we get some examples of universities that have signed up to the REC or who are pursuing curriculum change.

What it doesn’t say is that about £1.5bn of that £2.5bn is going on student financial support, and £1bn is going on access.

If its researchers had spent more than 30 seconds looking at the source of the figure they nicked from a John Blake speech, they’d know that the investment commitment figures in the APPs he was quoting from don’t actually include money to be spent on student success measures.

And anyway, thanks to the government’s loan repayment reforms, the actual cost to government of this stuff (as opposed to graduates) is between 6 per cent and 33 per cent, depending on the discount rate used.

Every little helps, I suppose.