Subscribe

Briefings

Daily BriefingEvery weekday · by 8amHigher education's essential morning read.Monday BriefingWeekly · MondaysThe full week ahead in HE policy.Friday ReviewWeekly · Friday lunchtimesWhat you need to know about the week just gone.

Newsletters & more

HE InfluencePolitics and policy and the way the sector is seen.HE CounselNewGovernance, law and regulation for anyone following legal developments.Policy RadarThe monthly live policy briefing – watch live or catch the replay on the portal.

Services

Wonkhe PassFull access for your whole institution.Wonkhe SUs PassFor students' unions – briefings, recordings and training.Free briefingThe Monday Briefing, Lite edition – free.
About Us+
About WonkhePeopleOur partnersWrite for WonkheContact us
Events
Latest+
Explore the whole archiveDataWonkhe researchLong readsAnalysisCommentWonk Corner
Podcast
SUs
Tuesday 29 September 2026Home of the higher education debate

Copyright © 2026 Thesis House Ltd.

Wonkhe is published by Thesis House Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no. 08784934), 31–35 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TE.

  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

What are universities for?

Today the Guardian asks the question, what are universities for? In the course of the article we see the usual dichotomy emerge between the traditional view of ‘learning for learning’s sake’ in which universities are positioned as guardians of knowledge and ‘institutions committed to deepening human understanding’ and the ‘marketised’ view of universities as contributing to public economic growth and preparing students for employment. Cambridge don Professor Stefan Collini is quoted in defence of the first view, with Carl Lygo, chief executive of BPP espousing the second. Lygo suggests that the fact that more students from his kind of background (he was the first in his family to attend university, and was eligible for free school meals) means that universities have become more utilitarian in their understanding of their purpose.

This article is more than 10 years old

Comment|11/10/11
Debbie McVitty

Debbie McVitty

Debbie is Editor of Wonkhe
Tags
  • Sector politics
Debbie McVitty
Debbie is Editor of Wonkhe

Today The Guardian asks the question, what are universities for?

In the course of the article we see the usual dichotomy emerge between the traditional view of ‘learning for learning’s sake’ in which universities are positioned as guardians of knowledge and ‘institutions committed to deepening human understanding’ and the ‘marketised’ view of universities as contributing to public economic growth and preparing students for employment. Cambridge don Professor Stefan Collini is quoted in defence of the first view, with Carl Lygo, chief executive of BPP espousing the second. Lygo suggests that the fact that more students from his kind of background (he was the first in his family to attend university, and was eligible for free school meals) means that universities have become more utilitarian in their understanding of their purpose.

It is tempting to suggest that one of the primary purposes of a university education is to develop the capacity to dismantle the false dichotomies so beloved of journalists.Without wishing to impugn the profession or indeed, suggest that either Collini's or Lygo's viewpoint as one-sided as this article seems to imply, where in this ‘debate’ is the acknowledgement that learning does not stop at the completion of a university degree?

That universities prepare students yes, for jobs, but for jobs that are intellectually challenging, infinitely variable and that require constant critical engagement with the world around us? Yes, our universities teach students how to think for themselves – but independent thought alone has no intrinsic value to the individual or to society.

University teaches students how to both think and to translate that thought into action in conversation, an essay, a project, a mechanical invention, an artistic creation, a political campaign or a business idea. The sheer pleasure of completing a project, making a contribution, helping other people to understand, takes place in all walks of life not just in universities, but it is through going to university that many of us begin to understand and practice this. To acknowledge the rich variety of career prospects – in the professions, in self-employment, in business and in the public and private sectors – available to university graduates in today’s knowledge economy is not to render universities utilitarian in purpose. Instead it is to understand how universities enable graduates to embark on careers where you get to use the brain you have worked so hard to develop.

Comments · 2

New comments will come back with sign-in later this year.

Andrew Fisher · 11 Oct 2011

Interesting that you should post this pretty much simultaneously with me posting http://heplanningblog.blogspot.com/2011/10/public-university-what-is-there-to.html I approach the question of what universities are for from the other end – what in practice are they actually doing? In social terms, I’m not sure the answer to that question is terribly comforting.

louis coiffait · 12 Oct 2011

Interesting stuff – it’s important to continue this debate. I agree that it’s all portrayed too black & white generally , you can have learning for the love of learning that also leads to employability / utilitarian / economic / other outcomes. See this work from last year I co-wrote with nef http://pearsonblueskies.com/what-should-higher-education-be-for/

Related articles

Image of a microscope

We need to stop romanticising the old-school technician

Aaqib Ayub | Comment | 29/09/26

Let’s not confuse institutional prestige with national priority

David Mba | Comment | 28/09/26

Getting into university isn’t enough

Antony Moss | Comment | 28/09/26

Aerial image of Liverpool city centre

If universities aren’t a priority, at least give them certainty

Ian Turgoose | Comment | 28/09/26

Students are working more than ever. Or are they?

Jim Dickinson | Comment | 25/09/26

Image of the Singapore skyline

Lessons in collaboration from Singapore

James Coe | Comment | 25/09/26