Subscribe

Briefings

Daily BriefingEvery weekday · by 8amHigher education's essential morning read.Monday BriefingWeekly · MondaysThe full week ahead in HE policy.Friday ReviewWeekly · Friday lunchtimesWhat you need to know about the week just gone.

Newsletters & more

HE InfluencePolitics and policy and the way the sector is seen.HE CounselNewGovernance, law and regulation for anyone following legal developments.Policy RadarThe monthly live policy briefing – watch live or catch the replay on the portal.

Services

Wonkhe PassFull access for your whole institution.Wonkhe SUs PassFor students' unions – briefings, recordings and training.Free briefingThe Monday Briefing, Lite edition – free.
About Us+
About WonkhePeopleOur partnersWrite for WonkheContact us
Events
Latest+
Explore the whole archiveDataWonkhe researchLong readsAnalysisCommentWonk Corner
Podcast
SUs
Monday 28 September 2026Home of the higher education debate

Copyright © 2026 Thesis House Ltd.

Wonkhe is published by Thesis House Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no. 08784934), 31–35 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TE.

  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Could universities’ Covid-19 response help us be more inclusive?

The pandemic-driven move to a distributed university has been hard work – but are there new benefits we can take back to the campus? Hannah Bartlett looks forward to a more inclusive way of working.

This article is more than 6 years old

Comment|2/04/20
Hannah Bartlett

Hannah Bartlett

Hannah Bartlett is Associate Pro-Vice Chancellor for Diversity & Inclusion at Aston University
Tags
  • Covid-19
  • inclusion
  • Technology
Hannah Bartlett
Hannah Bartlett is Associate Pro-Vice Chancellor for Diversity & Inclusion at Aston University

As universities contemplate the steps they can take to support students through the Covid-19 pandemic, our focus has been on digital platforms, online learning and video conferencing.

As disruptive and worrying this period is for students and staff, I wonder whether in the longer term there may be a positive impact on the inclusivity of practice across the sector.

Digital takes centre stage?

Provision of online learning materials is not a new concept; students are used to accessing their learning materials, submitting assessments and receiving feedback via virtual learning environments. However, the current situation forces a step forward. The increase in remote learning and working means that staff who have not previously used online teaching and learning platforms may now be encouraged to do so. The positive effect of this is the potential for a cultural change across the sector with wider engagement by staff and students in virtual classrooms, discussion boards, technology-focused approaches to revision and also the delivery of new forms of assessment. As David Glow advises, different technologies will be helpful in different circumstances, so there is a real opportunity for sharing of best practice within and between institutions.

This shift in staff experience level could be beneficial for some students with disabilities, caring responsibilities, or those who are experiencing challenging personal circumstances. If online delivery and support becomes more commonplace, then, for example, students attending on-campus learning environments virtually could become the norm rather than the exception.

There may also be a positive impact on staff morale. Many institutions are committed to providing recorded lectures and seminars for students to access online. The challenge of such commitment to this element of inclusive practice is that attendance tends to reduce. But what if students could choose whether to attend the session in person or virtually? Would this create a more engaged learning environment? The step change would be the design of learning materials and styles that incorporate both face to face and virtual attendees, but perhaps staff would welcome a different challenge if it made for more effective learning? As much as staff appreciate the importance of making learning materials available online, even the most enthusiastic among us can feel demoralised about creating engaging learning opportunities when just a fraction of the total cohort turn up.

Opening up leadership

Of course, thinking more inclusively about how we engage with students, will also help us to think about how we engage with each other. Being more flexible may well make it easier for people with seen and unseen disabilities to engage in a wider range of activities, providing the opportunity for progression and development.

From a leadership perspective, many of us have already been shifting towards telephone meetings and videoconferencing. This presents a real opportunity to embed more inclusive working practices. And creating those inclusive working environments is key to diversifying leadership. It is time that we moved away from the hierarchical expectations that the more senior the role, the less work life balance staff are expected to endure.

Covid-19 may help us to move on from the perceived need for senior staff to be present or available around the clock for dinners, keynotes, and meetings. A perceived need that plays firmly into structural bias against career progression for anyone who has any kind of responsibility outside of the workplace. This isn’t just about parents with young children; it is about anyone who has responsibility for any other person (with emphasis on ‘responsibility’). So it could be working parents, those with family members who are unwell, those who are supporting people with seen or unseen disabilities, or anyone with older relatives. The bottom line is that we are missing out if we can only allow those who can turn up at all hours into our senior leadership positions.

It is also likely that more of us will experience the challenge of caring over the coming weeks and months. The result of this could be wider acknowledgement of the challenges that carers face, but also of the empathy, resilience and broader perspective that those with caring responsibilities can bring to organisations. And how valuable these attributes are.

Moving forward, we will be forced to work differently. We will all have to think more inclusively about how we plan our teaching, learning, administrative and management load. Although it is happening under very challenging circumstances, it does provide the opportunity for positive change in the longer term.

Related articles

Let’s not confuse institutional prestige with national priority

David Mba | Comment | 28/09/26

Getting into university isn’t enough

Antony Moss | Comment | 28/09/26

Aerial image of Liverpool city centre

If universities aren’t a priority, at least give them certainty

Ian Turgoose | Comment | 28/09/26

Students are working more than ever. Or are they?

Jim Dickinson | Comment | 25/09/26

Image of the Singapore skyline

Lessons in collaboration from Singapore

James Coe | Comment | 25/09/26

Image of a postcard of the University of Birmingham bell tower on a cork board

Higher education postcard: Old Joe

Hugh Jones | Comment | 25/09/26

Comments · 1

New comments will come back with sign-in later this year.

Rushana · 12 May 2020

A very nice perspective. Indeed a new challenge moving forward will be designing materials and activities which are equally engaging both in the face-to-face and online modes. Thank you for this article.