As speculation mounts over potential changes to immigration rules impacting universities, Wendy Alexander reviews the issues involved in supporting the new cohort of international students
This article is more than 3 years old

For much of the academic year there has been speculation over the immigration rules surrounding international students.
The sector hopes its campaigning, supported by allies within Whitehall, will protect the graduate route - allowing students to remain in the UK for two years of post-study work.
This has underpinned the UK’s return to a competitive offer for international students when compared to other major study destinations.
But last autumn, the Home Secretary also signalled that she planned to restrict international masters’ students from being able to bring dependents to the UK.
An announcement on whether that will actually happen may be imminent.
The signalling that dependents were to be banned reverberated around the world, and has stimulated short term demand - as potential postgraduate students have seen the January and September 2023 entries as potentially their last chance to have their families accompany them to the UK.
For universities, the Home Office’s refusal to pass on data on dependent visa issuance means we have been unable to be transparent with local authorities or health services about local demand for family housing, nursery or school places.
The debate around dependents is nuanced - but denying us that data is the antithesis of joined up government.
Whatever the outcome on dependents, the new sending nations are here to stay. And these new students place new demands on institutions. According to HOLONIQ, over 70 per cent of global demand for higher education is in South Asia and Africa, as domestic capacity in these countries struggles to meet demand.
It’s already the case that first year Nigerians in the UK outnumber first years from the EU 27 member states. And ApplyBoard recently forecast that Nigeria would overtake China as the UK’s second largest source market after India for international education in the next five years.
Different global applicant preferences make it challenging for institutions to achieve a sought-after diversity of intake:
Africa and South Asia comprise over sixty diverse nations, but there are some common themes. Unlike China, these geographies send postgraduate students, often older, with dependents at home, and often facing strong affordability challenges - which means they wish to earn whilst they learn to reduce financial pressures on those accompanying them or back home. As domestic wealth rises we can expect more African and South Asian undergraduates, but the current central growth driver is taught postgraduate students.
Taken in the round, this all means that universities need to reassess their student support offer to better meet new student needs if the UK is to retain its reputation as a high-quality teaching, student support and progression destination.
So what can be done? We already lag on dimensions such as safety, affordability, welcome and work experience. But one of the attractions of the UK is that with a one-year masters as standard, and relatively successful visa processing, we represent some of the quickest routes to professional post-graduation employment and a move onto the skilled worker visa.
These older postgraduate students may not be looking for a traditional undergraduate student experience. Their aspirations are different - with a focus on securing their qualification, applying for the graduate route and exploring skilled migration opportunities whilst supporting their dependents here or in their home nation.
The push factors are strongest in nations subject to economic and political instability. Following the recent Nigerian election, the local media talk of the Japa phenomenon - the desire to flee which is driving decision making, intensified by the fear that 2023 will be the last chance to bring dependents to the UK.
Rising inflation in the sending and destination countries combine to undermine students’ financial security, compounded by rising accommodation costs. Nigeria’s inflation rate hit 22 per cent in March. ICEF recently highlighted the impact of the redesign of the naira (the Nigerian currency), foreign currency controls and currency depreciation on further undermining the ability of Nigerian students to finance their studies without hardship.
But Nigeria is not alone in facing an inflation and currency crisis. In March inflation in Sri Lanka stood at 50 per cent. Inevitably with such fast moving domestic crises, students from these countries face difficulties during their studies, notwithstanding they will have met the UKVI financial credibility test at the time of their visa application.
This year has seen accommodation shortages across the sector - with a lack of family accommodation and a lack of lower priced PBSA beds particular pain points. Banning dependents may moderate demand for family accommodation, however older postgraduate students do not want hall places, and would rather find reasonably priced rental accommodation.
It all means that universities must work closely with local authorities - and it is easy to point to the latter as bodies that can ensure local planning policies are more sympathetic to HMOs,, and with central government, support the functioning of a viable student rental market. Planning authorities need to use their planning powers and their convening role to model place-based demand in partnership with local tertiary education providers.
One consequence of the growth in volumes, age profile and differing cultural norms is the rise in pregnant students. The issues around pregnancy and a break in study are complex and vary by individual circumstance and programme. However the challenges around giving birth in a foreign country with limited family support can place significant demands on student support, welfare and compliance services.
It’s easy to point to others, but the wider planning and housing landscape is not a reason for the sector to wring its hands. As Jim Dickinson has argued on Wonkhe, universities are important actors in their local communities. It is possible to lead by example and to use one’s convening power within the institution and beyond to ensure appropriate student services.
The first steps are pre arrival, ensuring a student is ready to study. For example, we now undertake enhanced pre-CAS checks, often in country, exploring a student’s resources more deeply - although this can be challenging when candidates meet UKVI conditions.
I doubt any university in the UK would claim to have addressed all the evolving needs of new cohorts. But we have learned some lessons, and share them here to encourage others who are also rapidly pivoting to the needs of new international students:
As well as all of that, welcoming more South Asian and African students has prompted greater reflection about how to create an inclusive campus culture. The Race Equality Charter application uncovered racism on campus and in the city, demanding we take greater ownership of the need to speak up, model allyship and challenge racism.
We have also recently become a University of Sanctuary. Again, the application process engendered self-reflection about how our campus becomes more welcoming to all students including those from a refugee and migrant background.
We commissioned a Founders Report examining how the university was endowed in the nineteenth century by individuals whose wealth could be traced back to the transatlantic slave trade and work on a more global curriculum is in progress.
And we are also investigating new training in intercultural competence for staff. In all these ways we are becoming a more global institution to the benefit of all our students.
Overall, we are on a journey to becoming a truly global university and we want all students to experience campus as a global gateway. The operational challenge is to find a sustainable growth path whilst meeting the needs of new cohorts.
Anticipated policy changes have created uncertainty in sending markets, exacerbating the pressures on institutions and their local agencies in the short term. But whether our students’ dependents are with them in UK, or in their home country, these mature, cost conscious, employability focused new students are looking to their university for support.
The response will require a complex mix of sectoral, compliance, welfare, planning and housing actions. The interventions above are just one example of the sector rising to the challenge of new cohorts to foster the joined-up student experience they deserve. And it begins with active listening to those already studying with us.
New comments will come back with sign-in later this year.

Jim Dickinson | Comment | 25/09/26

James Coe | Comment | 25/09/26

Hugh Jones | Comment | 25/09/26

Richard Mills | Comment | 24/09/26

Vicki Stott | Comment | 24/09/26

Nic Beech | Comment | 23/09/26