UK Research and Innovation’s (UKRI’s) delivery plans have been published, with an emphasis on the need for a supportive and responsible culture for talent to flourish.
This contrasts with the stark description from many researchers, particularly in their early careers, of the ‘toxic’ culture in academia. You don’t have to look far to find testimonies to a hypercompetitive environment, where harassment and bullying are widespread, overwork is the norm and bureaucracy is overwhelming. Fear is endemic, and exacerbated by uncertainty around Brexit, Auger and pensions.
Feeling the fear
Fear, however, gets in the way of creativity, inspiration and productivity. Fear actually shrinks the size of the hippocampus, the part of the brain that is critical for long term memory, and which plays a role in creativity and imagination.
Fear also gets in the way of teamwork and our relationships with our colleagues. It makes us prioritise activities and actions that reduce the threat, not those that actively enhance our workplace well-being or our outputs. It prioritises the short term and the easy; and leaves the long term and harder challenges for another day. Feeling fearful makes us pull back cognitively and our limbic system shuts down higher functioning. Fear cannot be part of a supportive and responsible research and innovation culture.
So how can we dial down the fear and build trust? We could start by reducing the pressure of competition and encouraging collaboration at scale across the UK.
Reducing competitive pressures
Over the last two decades, assessment of research excellence and competition for research funding has driven up standards in the UK and helped to deliver one of, if not the most, effective and efficient research system in the world. It has been optimised to deliver significant numbers of high quality academic outputs for relatively low levels of investment compared to other nations.
But the law of diminishing returns means that we can’t continue to increase the productivity of our research and innovation base by squeezing it through more competition.
Margaret Heffernan, in her recent Athena lecture at Imperial College, spoke of the impact that increased competition has on “chronic misbehaviours” such as plagiarism, espionage, sabotage and fraud. She went on to say that “the idea that competition will create the best which will rise to the top is really suspect, because it isn’t paying attention to what the costs of that are.”
The marginal benefits of increased excellence through increasing competition come with significant costs; the impact of an unbalanced research system, a failure to address complex multidisciplinary challenges, our relative lack of success in converting research impact to increases in business productivity, a peer review system which is struggling to cope and the mental health and well-being of people working in universities.
Wringing the last ounce of excellence out of our research system through ever-increasing competition is costing an increasingly high price – it’s time to think about shifting the paradigm and to do things differently.
Investing in collaboration building and team science
If there is one area where no nation has yet found the solution, it’s in interdisciplinary research and team science. Improving our collective capability to work across discipline boundaries would give the UK a competitive advantage as well as enable us to address multifaceted research challenges like climate change and an ageing population. Learning to work together also has the potential to reduce competition, and hence fear and toxicity.
Some of the most insidious barriers to collaboration, particularly between disciplines or with non-academics are found in cultural norms; a perception that collaboration devalues research excellence, differences in working practices and methods, challenges to accepted practice, different ways of measuring success and excellence and, of course, disciplinary languages and jargon.
Daniel Coyle wrote:
Culture is a set of living relationships working towards a shared goal. It is not something you are, it is something you do.”
If we want to move away from a toxic competitive culture we need to change our relationships with each other. Happily, relationships are also the groundwork on which collaborations are built. I have written before on steps for collaborative relationship building and it’s clear to me that researchers, leaders and sector bodies all need to consider policies that incentivise these sorts of behaviours.
Breaking down barriers
To break down cultural barriers we need policies that help to lower the bar to entering into collaboration, to build relationships by providing time for researchers to come together in environments where people are not competing for status and resources and remove the fear of making mistakes. We need investment in settings for building trust, encouraging intellectual tolerance and diversity of approaches, so that a common language and understanding can emerge. And we need this at scale, so that we can develop new cultural norms which will position the UK at the forefront of multidisciplinary research globally.
By investing in social capital, as essential for collaboration as research infrastructure, we can change our research culture, address complex research challenges, and conduct internationally leading research. UKRI has demonstrated the potential of these investments; the NetworkPlus in Physics of Life, first launched in 2012, is now a major part of the Strategic Priorities Fund with investment of £31.2m from HM Treasury. By encouraging more collaboration and providing resources for that, we can begin to transform a toxic environment to one which is more supportive and tolerant, and where new ideas can flourish.
It’s time to scale these activities in line with our ambitions and revolutionise the research that we do and the way that we do it – that’s what will generate results.
One response to “To “deliver”, research needs a culture of support, not toxicity”