Subscribe

Briefings

Daily BriefingEvery weekday · by 8amHigher education's essential morning read.Monday BriefingWeekly · MondaysThe full week ahead in HE policy.Friday ReviewWeekly · Friday lunchtimesWhat you need to know about the week just gone.

Newsletters & more

HE InfluencePolitics and policy and the way the sector is seen.HE CounselNewGovernance, law and regulation for anyone following legal developments.Policy RadarThe monthly live policy briefing – watch live or catch the replay on the portal.

Services

Wonkhe PassFull access for your whole institution.Wonkhe SUs PassFor students' unions – briefings, recordings and training.Free briefingThe Monday Briefing, Lite edition – free.
About Us+
About WonkhePeopleOur partnersWrite for WonkheContact us
Events
Latest+
Explore the whole archiveDataWonkhe researchLong readsAnalysisCommentWonk Corner
Podcast
SUs
Friday 25 September 2026Home of the higher education debate

Copyright © 2026 Thesis House Ltd.

Wonkhe is published by Thesis House Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no. 08784934), 31–35 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TE.

  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Staff sexual misconduct on university campuses

Hareem Ghani, NUS women’s officer, introduces the union’s joint report with research and lobbying organisation The 1752 Group on staff sexual misconduct in UK higher education.

This article is more than 8 years old

Comment|4/04/18
Image: Shutterstock
Hareem Ghani

Hareem Ghani

Hareem Ghani is NUS’ Women’s Officer.
Tags
  • Campus
  • Sexual misconduct
  • Students
Hareem Ghani
Hareem Ghani is NUS’ Women’s Officer.

The NUS Women’s Campaign has been working to tackle sexual harassment on university campuses for over 10 years.

Ever since our Hidden Marks report was published in 2010, we have been lobbying and campaigning for institutions, the sector and government to do more to prevent these abuses from taking place and to support those affected when they do.

Significant progress has since been made. 2015 saw the government order a taskforce to look into reducing violence against women and girls on university campuses and, in 2016, Universities UK, who convened the taskforce, published the findings. All brought much-needed light to a pervasive problem, but nothing began to tackle or even examine staff-to-student sexual harassment in universities. Today’s report, Power in the Academy: staff sexual misconduct in UK higher education, aims to do just that.

In November 2017, the NUS Women’s Campaign teamed up with research and lobbying organisation The 1752 Group to launch a survey to find out more about staff-student sexual misconduct in higher education. The findings are alarming, particularly in relation to how staff misconduct affects women. However, we want to be clear that this is a descriptive study, rather than a prevalent one, and it seeks to address practices, procedures and cultures within HEIs.

Power and consent

The report revealed that 80% of respondents were uncomfortable with staff having sexual or romantic relationships with students. While it is not for us to recommend whether or not such relationships are inappropriate, the question of what sexual consent means in a relationship of unequal power should be discussed in HEIs across the country. To address the consequences of professional boundaries being broken, a nuanced conversation around power and consent in sexual relationships between staff and students in higher education is needed. A third of UK universities do not currently have any policies governing staff-student relationships. As such, we recommend that policies and practices for cases surrounding abuse perpetrated by staff must be created, or - in institutions where they already exist - be implemented and made more robust.

For too long these problems have been side-lined or silenced by institutions. Fewer than 1 in 10 respondents who experiences misconduct reported it to their institution. However, simply encouraging students to report incidents will not solve the problem. Given the lack of clarity around professional boundaries and disciplinary processes, it is unsurprising that students do not have confidence in their university to deal with their concern appropriately. For institutions that already have policies in place, we must see an immediate review, and resilient changes made where the institutions are found to lack any sort of guidelines. Ultimately, these need to balance the rights of the student with those of staff members and ensure a transparent process is followed. We hope that this report will help us challenge cultures of entitlement and stop abuses of power.

Funding

There is still a long way to go. This study is just the beginning of a campaign to address unequal power structures and their effects on the groups most at risk of harm - women, and LGBT+ students, to name a few. We need a prevalent study across all higher education institutions and we call on the sector - via the Office for Students and Universities UK - to provide funding for a UK-wide piece of work. We look forward to working with sector bodies to discuss the recommendations enclosed in today’s report in more depth to make higher education a safe environment for all students.

Related articles

Students are working more than ever. Or are they?

Jim Dickinson | Comment | 25/09/26

Image of the Singapore skyline

Lessons in collaboration from Singapore

James Coe | Comment | 25/09/26

Image of a postcard of the University of Birmingham bell tower on a cork board

Higher education postcard: Old Joe

Hugh Jones | Comment | 25/09/26

A field guide to mergers in higher education

Richard Mills | Comment | 24/09/26

If Scotland’s university funding problem is systemic, the response must be too

Vicki Stott | Comment | 24/09/26

There’s nine more pieces for the Quality Code

Nic Beech | Comment | 23/09/26

Comments

New comments will come back with sign-in later this year.