• About Us
    • About Wonkhe
    • Our subscriptions
    • People
    • Our partners
    • Pitch an article
    • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Latest
    • Explore the whole archive
    • Podcasts
    • Data
    • Wonkhe research
    • Long reads
    • Analysis
    • Comment
    • Wonk Corner
  • Jobs
    • Live jobs
    • Jobs posting & prices
  • Subscription
    • Our subscriptions
    • Wonkhe Pass
    • Monday Briefing
    • Daily Briefing
    • Friday Review
    • Wonkhe SUs
    • Policy Update
  • SUs
    • SUs HOME
    • SUs LOGIN
    • ADD NEW SUs USER
    • COST OF LIVING HUB
    • BRIEFINGS INDEX
    • WEBINAR INDEX
    • LATEST SUs BLOGS
    • FREE SPEECH
    • SU STRATEGIES
  • Wonkhe Bluesky
  • Wonkhe Bluesky
  • icon-comments 2
  • About Us
    • About Wonkhe
    • Our subscriptions
    • People
    • Our partners
    • Pitch an article
    • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Latest
    • Explore the whole archive
    • Podcasts
    • Data
    • Wonkhe research
    • Long reads
    • Analysis
    • Comment
    • Wonk Corner
  • Jobs
    • Live jobs
    • Jobs posting & prices
  • Subscription
    • Our subscriptions
    • Wonkhe Pass
    • Monday Briefing
    • Daily Briefing
    • Friday Review
    • Wonkhe SUs
    • Policy Update
  • SUs
    • SUs HOME
    • SUs LOGIN
    • ADD NEW SUs USER
    • COST OF LIVING HUB
    • BRIEFINGS INDEX
    • WEBINAR INDEX
    • LATEST SUs BLOGS
    • FREE SPEECH
    • SU STRATEGIES
  • Wonkhe Bluesky
This article is more than 5 years old
by Julie Wells
Comment
9/09/19

How can we assess the public value of universities?

Is there a fair and robust way to measure how well universities engage with the outside world? University leaders from Australia and the UK are trying to find out.
This article is more than 5 years old
by Julie Wells
Comment
9/09/19
civic-time-city-wonkhe
Image: IKON
Julie Wells Wonkhe
Julie Wells Wonkhe

Julie Wells

Vice President, Strategy and Culture

by
staff
14/08/19

Julie Wells is Vice President, Strategy and Culture at the University of Melbourne

grant_jonathan
grant_jonathan

Jonathan Grant

Contributing Editor, Wonkhe

by
staff
27/11/17

Jonathan Grant is the Vice President for Strategic Initiatives at the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) in Saudi Arabia

Tags

  • Civic
  • public engagement
Julie Wells

Julie Wells is Vice President, Strategy and Culture at the University of Melbourne

Tags

  • Civic
  • public engagement

Jonathan Grant

Jonathan Grant is the Vice President for Strategic Initiatives at the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) in Saudi Arabia

Commentators around the world are challenging the perception that universities provide public value. Driven by high tuition fees, burdens on the public purse, an entitlement culture in universities and an anti-elitist sentiment more broadly in society, universities often find themselves on the back foot having to defend what they do in utilitarian terms such as value for money, job prospects, graduate salaries, contribution to GDP growth and so on.

But these arguments no longer work. The Brexit vote in the UK is a good example of where political dialogue has moved away from the instrumental and technocratic evidence-based policymaking of the past 30 years, to something that is forming around identity, emotion and inclusiveness. Such a set of values is almost the antithesis to what universities are, but it is critical that, as they navigate this new world, universities adapt and evolve to this new reality otherwise their licence to operate will becoming increasingly tenuous.

This is the journey that we, along with the University of Chicago, are on as three traditional and world recognised universities located in the anglosphere of the United Kingdom, Australia and the United States of America. Independently we have included engagement (or “Service” in King’s language) as part of our academic mission. Here we define “Engagement as a holistic approach to working collaboratively with partners and communities, to create mutually-beneficial outcomes for each other and the benefit of society”.

But one of the challenges we face as leaders of these activities is persuading our colleagues that engagement is an equal partner to education and research in our academic missions. This was a key conclusion that emerged from the 2017 Global University Engagement Summit, hosted by the University of Melbourne that we all participated in. Universities must do more (and indeed have the responsibility and ability) to demonstrate their societal value, particularly in response to rising social inequality and the apparent decline of evidence-based policymaking.

Incorporating engagement into global league tables was seen as a way to recognise current engagement activities, incentivise the sector to do more, and drive long-lasting change.

There is no consensus on how to compare and measure engagement in higher education. As a result, many possible metrics to measure engagement exist. The challenge is to determine the correct suite of metrics that sufficiently capture and reflect an institution’s engagement performance, with relevance across the globe.

To help the process of selecting engagement metrics we have developed a theory of change to articulate the outcomes we would like to see. These include: leadership buy-in, reflected through the institution’s structure and senior endorsement; communities and universities value each other’s contributions; resource allocation decisions reflect commitment to engagement; reward and recognition for staff, faculty and students who participate in engagement activities; and, curriculum and research incorporate engagement activities.

The underpinning assumption is that publicly reporting engagement performance will drive these behaviour changes. By working collaboratively with 18 universities globally we have developed a suite of eight indicators that could drive these behaviours when measured and incorporated in global league tables.

The indicators are clearly a proxy for the sort of activities that we are looking to recognise and incentivise through their measurement but cover a broad remit – ranging from research impact to green energy, from curriculum content to procurement practices. The indicators are currently being piloted and the results will be published in the autumn.

We recognise that measuring engagement is difficult and that not everyone will agree with our pragmatic approach of engaging with global league tables. But we are of the view that while such crude rankings are used then they must evolve to capture the breadth of universities activities and shift the focus to engagement. Recent efforts through THE Impact Rankings are a good step in the right direction.

Our approach is, we would argue, simpler, less burdensome and crucially, university-led. If you would like to be part of this project, feel free to contact us.

Share

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)
  • icon-comments 2
  • icon-share

Share

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)

wonkfest Wonkfest 2019 side 1

wonkfest-2019-wonkhe
wonkfest-2019-wonkhe

View here
by
featured message
2/08/18

2 responses to “How can we assess the public value of universities?”

  1. Mary Stuart says:
    Sep 9 2019 at 8:52 am

    Interesting to see who is involved in this

    Reply
  2. Sophie Short says:
    Sep 9 2019 at 9:26 am

    One way for universities to demonstrate their social value is by achieving the Social Enterprise Mark/Gold Mark. Several UK universities have been through our external assessment process, which requires them to report on their impact on society and the local community. The Gold Mark in particular covers many of the areas you mention in your theory of change. Perhaps there is some synergy here and our own criteria/assessment could be incorporated into your project?

    Reply

Leave a replyCancel reply

Related articles

Growing,Partnership,And,Teamwork,Communication,In,Business,With,Two,Trees
Image: Shutterstock

This is what greater collaboration between further and higher education in England should look like

by Sam Parrett
Comment
9/04/25
tram, manchester, bee network, transport
Image: Shutterstock

Building a public transport agenda for commuter students

by Joel Dowson
Comment
4/04/25
Small,Umbrella,And,Coins,On,Light,Blue,Background
Image: Shutterstock

No more civic washing – most universities now pay their staff a living wage

by Jonathan Grant
Comment
13/01/25
Shutterstock_2159675761
Image: Shutterstock

The class gap in the civic map

by James Coe
Comment
19/12/24
Shutterstock_2242201271
Image: Shutterstock

Innovation and skills in the English devolution white paper

by David Kernohan
Policy Watch
17/12/24
Shutterstock_2383265067
Image: Shutterstock

Professional services staff should have a voice in policy engagement

by Claire Toogood
Comment
25/11/24
Shutterstock_2038752104
Image: Shutterstock

When nativism and deglobalisation meet the sagging bottom line

by Simon Marginson
Comment
23/11/24
Image: Shutterstock

Universities may be a priority for reform but they are not a priority for investment

by Rachel Wolf
Comment
11/11/24

Copyright © 2025 Wonkhe Ltd.

Company Number: 08784934

Wonkhe Bluesky

Wonkhe Ltd, 31-35 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TE

  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Wonkhe Mondays

By submitting you agree to our terms and conditions