Subscribe

Briefings

Daily BriefingEvery weekday · by 8amHigher education's essential morning read.Monday BriefingWeekly · MondaysThe full week ahead in HE policy.Friday ReviewWeekly · Friday lunchtimesWhat you need to know about the week just gone.

Newsletters & more

HE InfluencePolitics and policy and the way the sector is seen.HE CounselNewGovernance, law and regulation for anyone following legal developments.Policy RadarThe monthly live policy briefing – watch live or catch the replay on the portal.

Services

Wonkhe PassFull access for your whole institution.Wonkhe SUs PassFor students' unions – briefings, recordings and training.Free briefingThe Monday Briefing, Lite edition – free.
About Us+
About WonkhePeopleOur partnersWrite for WonkheContact us
Events
Latest+
Explore the whole archiveDataWonkhe researchLong readsAnalysisCommentWonk Corner
Podcast
SUs
Friday 25 September 2026Home of the higher education debate

Copyright © 2026 Thesis House Ltd.

Wonkhe is published by Thesis House Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no. 08784934), 31–35 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TE.

  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Higher education postcard: shields of empire

This week’s card from Hugh Jones’ postbag has some errors and a mystery

This article is more than 1 year old

Comment|27/09/24
Image: Hugh Jones
Hugh Jones

Hugh Jones

Hugh Jones is a freelance HE consultant. You’ll find a daily #HigherEducationPostcard if you follow him on Bluesky
Tags
  • postcards
Hugh Jones
Hugh Jones is a freelance HE consultant. You’ll find a daily #HigherEducationPostcard if you follow him on Bluesky

Greetings from the past!

Today’s postcard (which, as we will see, was sent in 1907) is full of heraldic shields. And the shields are a colourful, if eclectic, selection.

You’ve got the four Scottish ancients: St Andrews, Glasgow, Aberdeen and Edinburgh. But not Strathclyde, which was known as Anderson’s University in the mid-nineteenth century.

You’ve got the Welsh university colleges (as they were then) at Aberystwyth, Bangor and Cardiff; but also St David’s College, which wasn’t part of the University of Wales; and the University of Wales itself is absent.

You’ve got the English universities – Oxford, Cambridge, Durham, London, Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool, Leeds and Sheffield. And then you’ve got some institutions which were definitely not yet universities – Bristol (1909), Reading (1926), Nottingham (1948), and Southampton (1952).

In Ireland you’ve got Dublin (which is the university of which Trinity College Dublin is the only college); Queen’s Ireland (which did not exist in 1907, but the shield is similar to Queen’s Belfast); and Ireland, which is the Royal University of Ireland, which included Queen’s College Belfast, as well as counterparts at Dublin, Cork, Limerick, Galway, and Derry.

And then for the then colonies you have Sydney (1850) and Melbourne (1853), but Adelaide (1874) and Tasmania (1890) are ignored. Missing completely is the (then) University of Bombay (1857). Also absent: no end of universities in Canada, including (but not limited to) McGill, Dalhousie, Toronto, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Université Laval, Ottawa. Loads of Canadian universities. And not present either are the New Zealand/Aotearoa universities which existed in 1907: Otago, Canterbury, Auckland and the Victoria University of Wellington.

So, there’s a lesson here that you shouldn’t put too much weight on postcards as a reliable source of information (as we have also seen in the case of University College Oxford).

But the back of this card makes it special.

Dated New Year’s Day, 1907, there’s a message in Pitman shorthand. Which I can’t read. But thanks to the power of Twitter, and the kindness of Annie Rosina Compton (and friend) and Kathryn Baird (who has written a book on shorthand postcards!), I can share what the message says:

Perfect happiness. Nineteen weeks and the first day of the New Year and I hope this time next year I shall say just the same thing. Fraser

Who was Fraser, and to whom was the message addressed? We’ll never know. But its good to have a touch of mystery romance to wonder at.

Related articles

Students are working more than ever. Or are they?

Jim Dickinson | Comment | 25/09/26

Image of the Singapore skyline

Lessons in collaboration from Singapore

James Coe | Comment | 25/09/26

Image of a postcard of the University of Birmingham bell tower on a cork board

Higher education postcard: Old Joe

Hugh Jones | Comment | 25/09/26

A field guide to mergers in higher education

Richard Mills | Comment | 24/09/26

If Scotland’s university funding problem is systemic, the response must be too

Vicki Stott | Comment | 24/09/26

There’s nine more pieces for the Quality Code

Nic Beech | Comment | 23/09/26

Comments · 1

New comments will come back with sign-in later this year.

Mike Ratcliffe · 27 Sept 2024

It’s a fine postcard, nicely decoded by Hugh. As ever, it’s interesting to see how hierarchy is depicted by commercial interests (in this case to sell a postcard, see also league tables).

If the postcard was printed in 1905 or 1906 (so after Sheffield gets university status) then they are looking forward, as Hugh notes, to Queens’ Belfast leaving the federal university in Ireland. It stops being the Royal University and becomes the National University in 1908.

The dates given to the former members of the Victoria University are odd – both Manchester and Leeds have 1880, which is the date of the foundation of Victoria, both predate that but Leeds only joined the federal university in the same year, 1884, as Liverpool which had been founded in 1881. The date given to Birmingham is when it became a university in 1900, not when it was founded (pick from 1825 or 1875 depending on which predecessor you think most appropriate). This postcard won’t be the last time that there’s a muddle over founding dates.