Subscribe

Briefings

Daily BriefingEvery weekday · by 8amHigher education's essential morning read.Monday BriefingWeekly · MondaysThe full week ahead in HE policy.Friday ReviewWeekly · Friday lunchtimesWhat you need to know about the week just gone.

Newsletters & more

HE InfluencePolitics and policy and the way the sector is seen.HE CounselNewGovernance, law and regulation for anyone following legal developments.Policy RadarThe monthly live policy briefing – watch live or catch the replay on the portal.

Services

Wonkhe PassFull access for your whole institution.Wonkhe SUs PassFor students' unions – briefings, recordings and training.Free briefingThe Monday Briefing, Lite edition – free.
About Us+
About WonkhePeopleOur partnersWrite for WonkheContact us
Events
Latest+
Explore the whole archiveDataWonkhe researchLong readsAnalysisCommentWonk Corner
Podcast
SUs
Friday 25 September 2026Home of the higher education debate

Copyright © 2026 Thesis House Ltd.

Wonkhe is published by Thesis House Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no. 08784934), 31–35 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TE.

  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

A short guide to the Office for Students’ new powers

Susan Lapworth of the Office for Students runs through the details for the new regulatory regime

This article is more than 7 years old

Comment|12/09/19
Image: Shutterstock
Susan Lapworth

Susan Lapworth

Susan Lapworth is Chief Executive at the Office for Students
Tags
  • HEAct2017
  • Regulation
Susan Lapworth
Susan Lapworth is Chief Executive at the Office for Students

The Higher Education and Research Act 2017 (HERA) fundamentally changed the way higher education is regulated in England. While the Bill became law in 2017, we at the Office for Students have held our full powers for only a month. We’ve set a clear direction and strategy but, quite understandably, the higher education sector is still getting used to the very significant changes that the new regulatory system brings.

Real progress has been made. As of today, 386 universities, colleges and other higher education providers are on the register. That means that over 99 per cent of students who are continuing courses from 2018-19 are studying at an OfS-registered provider.

There are a small number of providers with continuing students that do not yet have a final registration decision. There are several possible reasons for this. Some providers have only recently applied for registration. For others, we need to gather further evidence that the initial conditions of registration are satisfied, either from the provider itself, from the designated quality body, or from a review of management and governance arrangements. We are not permitted to register a provider until we are able to confirm that each initial condition is satisfied and gathering further evidence to do this can take time. There is a final group where we have told providers that we are minded to refuse their application for registration. We’re required by law to seek and fully consider representations about such a provisional decision and this too can take time.

We’ve put in place arrangements to protect continuing students at providers that have applied for registration but do not yet have a final decision. The same arrangements are also in place for providers that have not made an application for registration but have students continuing courses into 2019-20. We’re using powers delegated to us by the Secretary of State that allow us to designate courses for student support purposes – this is the statutory power that DfE previously used to allow access to student loan funding for providers that we used to call ‘alternative providers’. These powers are separate to the HERA powers we use for registration and we are only able to use them in defined circumstances. But they are important powers, and we’re using them specifically to ensure that students can continue with their studies without disruption.

Limited designation

‘Limited designation’ allows continuing eligible students at providers which were not registered by 31 July 2019 to receive student support. This designation was put in place before 31 July, to ensure seamless support for these students. This designation is ‘limited’ as it will only remain in place until we have made a final registration decision (and, if necessary, while the provider makes an application for designation for teach-out), unless we need to take earlier action to protect the student interest, or public funds, in which case we may suspend or revoke the designation.

We don’t name providers with limited designation. That’s because they are in the middle of a formal regulatory process until we have reached a final registration decision and it’s not appropriate for us to comment on their status. Providers are, of course, free to speak with their students about their situation and we have asked them to do so to ensure that students understand the provider’s regulatory status.

Designation for teach-out

If a provider is refused registration we give it the opportunity to apply for designation for ‘teach-out’ purposes. A period of ‘teach-out’ allows existing students to continue to access student support for the course they are studying. This process requires a provider to meet eligibility criteria and a number of initial and ongoing requirements. If designation for teach-out is granted this gives certainty to the provider, and its students, about continued access to student support for the teach-out period.

Sometimes, the period of designation may end before all students have completed their course. Where this happens, the provider must have an approved student transfer plan in place which sets out in detail how it will support students should they need to consider transferring to another provider in order to complete their course.

Working with providers

We will monitor designated providers to ensure that our requirements continue to be met. Our student protection and market exit team is leading on this work as part of our commitment to students that their interests will be protected in the event of provider, campus, or course closure.

Decisions about registration – whether to approve or refuse applications – are not taken lightly. Registration with the OfS brings a range of significant benefits for providers and important protections for students. So, while we will conclude registration decisions as quickly as possible, we won’t do anything that reduces the rigour and robustness of our decision-making. That’s the right thing to do, for current and future students. It is their interests that will continue to guide all our work.

Related articles

Students are working more than ever. Or are they?

Jim Dickinson | Comment | 25/09/26

Image of the Singapore skyline

Lessons in collaboration from Singapore

James Coe | Comment | 25/09/26

Image of a postcard of the University of Birmingham bell tower on a cork board

Higher education postcard: Old Joe

Hugh Jones | Comment | 25/09/26

A field guide to mergers in higher education

Richard Mills | Comment | 24/09/26

If Scotland’s university funding problem is systemic, the response must be too

Vicki Stott | Comment | 24/09/26

There’s nine more pieces for the Quality Code

Nic Beech | Comment | 23/09/26

Comments · 1

New comments will come back with sign-in later this year.

So Universities Are Not… The Probable Shape of the Future | A Corner of Tenth-Century Europe · 11 Mar 2022

[…] will subsidise when they will subsidise nothing else). As part of that trend we have seen not just the increased powers given to the Office for Students – which it still hasn’t really ever used, just turned […]