Wonkhe SUs · The 2026 webinar box set
Harassment and sexual misconduct
How to make a difference on student safety at university – with Condition E6 now in force.
Checking your subscription…
One moment while we confirm your access to this recording.
We set out the scale of harassment and sexual misconduct, why it's not a side issue, and how we got from the Zellick report to Condition E6. We work through the anatomy of E6 – mandatory training, capacity, fair processes, free-speech principles, prevention and support, and the staff-student relationship rules – the SU's own duties as an employer, the OIA's good practice framework, and what SUs can do with their own data. Throughout, Anna draws on the 1752 Group's research (https://1752group.com/). With Anna Bull, Senior Lecturer in Education and Social Justice, University of York, and co-director of the 1752 Group. Please note: this session discusses harassment and sexual misconduct, including sexual violence. If you are affected, support is available from Rape Crisis England & Wales (0808 500 2222, free, 24/7) and your students' union or university support services.
What we cover
- The scale – 22% of students experiencing harassment, 24.5% of finalists experiencing sexual harassment, and why these are floor figures.
- Not a side issue – the links to value for money, retention and wellbeing for students who experience harassment.
- The reporting funnel – how few harassed students report, and how many rate the experience as good.
- Not only sexual – E6 covers harassment across all protected characteristics, not only sexual misconduct.
- How we got here – from Hidden Marks and "lad culture" to the voluntary statements and Condition E6 in force from August 2025.
- The anatomy of E6 – mandatory training (with specialist staff), capacity to deliver, fair processes, free-speech principles, prevention and support, and the staff-student relationship rules.
- Power and process – why students (women and LGBTQ+ students especially) are overwhelmingly uncomfortable with staff-student relationships, and what fair process looks like.
- The legal layers – the SU's own duties as an employer, and the OIA's good-practice framework for complaints.
- Risk by subject and setting – why prevention is risk assessment, not policy-polishing.
- Who gets missed – PGRs, students on placement (medicine especially) and international students, and what SUs can do with their own data.
Things to read
- All Wonkhe SUs explainers on harassment and sexual misconduct
- All Wonkhe articles tagged harassment
- Here's what SUs need to know about OfS' new condition of registration on harassment and sexual misconduct
- 20 questions SUs should ask about harassment and sexual misconduct
- UUK has new guidance on staff-student sexual misconduct
- Staff sexual misconduct – improving students' rights
- Here's what the OfS sector-level sexual misconduct data says and what it means for SUs
- What all SUs need to know about sexism and sexual violence in UK medical education
- How to protect international students from harassment and sexual misconduct
- A new duty on SUs is coming re sexual harassment – here's what SUs need to know
- How to improve your university's handling of allegations of sexual misconduct
- How to ensure that students disclose sexual misconduct
- Should universities tell students the outcome of harassment and sexual misconduct complaints?
- Tackling racial harassment in higher education
- What SUs can learn from complaints about harassment and sexual misconduct
- The almost-ban on staff student relationships needs clarifying and simplifying
- What's missing from OfS' new approach on harassment and sexual misconduct?
- How to address harassment and sexual misconduct experienced by PGRs