Subscribe

Briefings

Daily BriefingEvery weekday · by 8amHigher education's essential morning read.Monday BriefingWeekly · MondaysThe full week ahead in HE policy.Friday ReviewWeekly · Friday lunchtimesWhat you need to know about the week just gone.

Newsletters & more

HE InfluencePolitics and policy and the way the sector is seen.HE CounselNewGovernance, law and regulation for anyone following legal developments.Policy RadarThe monthly live policy briefing – watch live or catch the replay on the portal.

Services

Wonkhe PassFull access for your whole institution.Wonkhe SUs PassFor students' unions – briefings, recordings and training.Free briefingThe Monday Briefing, Lite edition – free.
About Us+
About WonkhePeopleOur partnersWrite for WonkheContact us
Events
Latest+
Explore the whole archiveDataWonkhe researchLong readsAnalysisCommentWonk Corner
Podcast
SUs
Monday 28 September 2026Home of the higher education debate

Copyright © 2026 Thesis House Ltd.

Wonkhe is published by Thesis House Ltd, registered in England and Wales (no. 08784934), 31–35 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TE.

  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

£5.4m claimed in ineligible student support

A report released today by the National Audit Office reveals that students at alternative higher education providers have claimed taxpayer-backed financial support that they were not entitled to.

This article is more than 10 years old

Policy Watch|2/12/14
Emily Lupton

Emily Lupton

Graduate Editor
Tags
  • Fees and Funding
  • Students
  • UK Government
Emily Lupton
Graduate Editor

A report released today by the National Audit Office reveals that students at alternative higher education providers have claimed taxpayer-backed financial support that they were not entitled to.

The report Investigation into financial support for students at alternative higher education providers focused on four areas of concern:

  • Students at some alternative providers claiming support for which they are not eligible
  • Some providers recruiting students who do not have the capability or motivation to complete their courses
  • Some providers recruiting students in receipt of student support onto courses that the Department for Business, Innovation & Skills (BIS) had not approved; and
  • Some providers have given BIS inaccurate information about student attendance.

Investigation by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) and the Student Loans Company (SLC) found that at the end of October 2014, a total of 992 students from the EU who were ineligible for publicly funded support had already received £5.4 million from the Student Loans Company before payments to them were suspended.

Between 2010/11 and 2013/14 the number of students claiming student support for courses at alternative providers rose nearly eight-fold, from 7,000 to 53,000. In the same period, the total amount of public money paid to students at alternative providers, though tuition fee loans, maintenance loans and grants, has risen from around £50million to £675 million.

The report also highlights a worryingly high dropout rate. At alternative providers, dropout rates were higher than 20 per cent in 2012/13. This is far larger than the average dropout rate for the rest of the higher education sector which is 4 per cent.

A possible 20 per cent of Higher National students recruited by alternative providers and claiming student support may not have been registered with the qualification awarding body in 2012/13. As highlighted in the report, the SLC does not have powers to check that providers have registered students with an awarding body before making student support payments. There has been no investigation by the oversight bodies into this.

RT Hon Margaret Hodge MP, Chair of the Committee of Public Accounts made a statement on the report. “This extraordinary rate of expansion, high drop-out rates, and warnings from within the sector ought to have set alarm bells ringing.

As Government hands more and more taxpayers’ money to private companies and institutions to deliver services for the public good, we have to be able to follow the taxpayers’ pound wherever it is spent.

I look forward to hearing from the Department for Business, Innovation & Skills, the Student Loans Company and the Higher Education Funding Council for England on 15 December about how they are getting on top of this.”

Comments

New comments will come back with sign-in later this year.

Related articles

Counting the cost of teaching higher education in England

David Kernohan | Policy Watch | 18/09/26

The tone has changed on free speech, but the architecture hasn’t

Jim Dickinson | Policy Watch | 17/09/26

Student loans are still broken and unfair

Jim Dickinson | Policy Watch | 13/09/26

Purple background with some flowers to the right and a card that says "I'm sorry"

We’re very sorry, and we won’t do it again

David Kernohan | Policy Watch | 4/09/26

Assessing Scotland’s sector finances

David Kernohan | Policy Watch | 28/08/26

The absolutism is watered down in OfS’ amendments to its free speech guidance

Jim Dickinson | Policy Watch | 5/08/26