Two more quality reviews in Scotland tell us more about the rights students should enjoy
Jim Dickinson continues Wonkhe’s series on Scotland’s Tertiary Quality Enhancement Reviews, this time covering Edinburgh Napier and Aberdeen, both judged effective, and what the findings mean for SUs across the devolved nations.
Related articles
A field guide to mergers in higher education
Richard Mills | Comment | 24/09/26
If Scotland’s university funding problem is systemic, the response must be too
Vicki Stott | Comment | 24/09/26
There’s nine more pieces for the Quality Code
Nic Beech | Comment | 23/09/26
Conversations about academic authorship need to be transparent
Madeleine Pownall | Comment | 23/09/26
