Paul Ashwin

Author

Paul Ashwin

Professor of Higher Education, Lancaster University

I am a Professor of Higher Education and my research interests are focused on the relations between teaching-learning and knowledge-curriculum practices in higher education. I am also interested in the relations between these practices and higher education policies as well as the relations between theories and methods in research into higher education. The kinds of questions that I explore in this research include: What counts as high quality teaching and learning in higher education? How is this positioned in policies and practices? How do we research and theorise these competing notions of quality?

 

12 pieces

Newest first, since December 2015

  1. · Comment

    Back to the future for the TEF? Back to school for OfS?

    OfS is again flirting with the idea of linking tuition fees to TEF outcomes – a proposal that, as Paul Ashwin argues, is as unworkable now as it was a decade ago.

  2. · Comment

    Ventriloquising the student interest

    Paul Ashwin argues that the Office for Students’ proposed strategy puts government priorities into the mouths of students

  3. · Comment

    The independent review of the OfS gets its completely wrong on quality

    Paul Ashwin remains profoundly unconvinced by the the Behan review prescription on regulating quality and standards

  4. · Comment

    Rank hypocrisy – how universities betray their promises on responsible research assessment

    It is time for universities to stop the nonsense of participating in flawed university rankings exercises, argue Paul Ashwin and Derek Heim

    With Derek Heim

  5. · Comment

    What use is TEF to applicants?

    There’s a danger in the way TEF is presented to applicants. Paul Ashwin spots the warning signs.

  6. · Comment

    What’s the future for the TEF – and how might we shape it?

    A laser-like focus on enhancement would improve the TEF dramatically, argues Paul Ashwin

  7. · Comment

    Can OfS help level up the country?

    Is OfS the right regulator for the times we live in – and if not, how could it better serve students? Andy Westwood, Paul Ashwin, Syahadah Shahril, Johnny Rich and Joy Elliott-Bowman have ideas

    With Andy Westwood, Syahadah Shahril, Johnny Rich and Joy Elliott-Bowman

  8. · Comment

    The government’s response to the Pearce review of TEF doesn’t do justice to it

    The government’s failure to seriously engage with the Pearce review’s proposals sets the TEF on a course towards irrelevance, argues Paul Ashwin.

  9. · Comment

    Higher education is transformative – it should be open to all

    Marking publication of his new book Transforming University Education: A Manifesto, Paul Ashwin argues that universities must be for more than the academic elite.

  10. · Comment

    Policymakers claiming the NSS is driving down standards should get their own house in order

    The government has announced a major review of the National Student Survey. Paul Ashwin questions the assumptions behind the review.

  11. · Comment

    Knowledge is power: the purpose of quality teaching

    Quality teaching is about transforming lives. Paul Ashwin argues that excellent teaching leads to students acquiring powerful knowledge.

  12. · Analysis

    Three muddles that will undermine the TEF

    Higher education professor Paul Ashwin sets out three muddles in the design of the TEF as set out in the Green Paper, which will undermine some of the good aspects of what the policy is trying to achieve.