• About Us
    • About Wonkhe
    • Our subscriptions
    • People
    • Our partners
    • Pitch an article
    • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Latest
    • Explore the whole archive
    • Podcasts
    • Data
    • Wonkhe research
    • Long reads
    • Analysis
    • Comment
    • Wonk Corner
  • Jobs
    • Live jobs
    • Jobs posting & prices
  • Subscription
    • Our subscriptions
    • Wonkhe Pass
    • Wonkhe Mondays
    • Wonkhe Daily
    • Wonkhe SUs
    • Policy Update
  • SUs
    • SUs HOME
    • SUs LOGIN
    • ADD NEW SUs USER
    • BRIEFINGS INDEX
    • WEBINAR INDEX
    • FREE SPEECH
    • LATEST SUs BLOGS AND BRIEFINGS
  • icon-comments 2
  • About Us
    • About Wonkhe
    • Our subscriptions
    • People
    • Our partners
    • Pitch an article
    • Contact Us
  • Events
  • Latest
    • Explore the whole archive
    • Podcasts
    • Data
    • Wonkhe research
    • Long reads
    • Analysis
    • Comment
    • Wonk Corner
  • Jobs
    • Live jobs
    • Jobs posting & prices
  • Subscription
    • Our subscriptions
    • Wonkhe Pass
    • Wonkhe Mondays
    • Wonkhe Daily
    • Wonkhe SUs
    • Policy Update
  • SUs
    • SUs HOME
    • SUs LOGIN
    • ADD NEW SUs USER
    • BRIEFINGS INDEX
    • WEBINAR INDEX
    • FREE SPEECH
    • LATEST SUs BLOGS AND BRIEFINGS
This article is more than 2 years old
by Paul Manners
Comment
13/05/20

Communicating research during Covid-19

Paul Manners breaks down best practice in engaging the public with research during the pandemic.
This article is more than 2 years old
by Paul Manners
Comment
13/05/20
Winter_2017_Cover_v5
Image: Ikon
Wonkhe_Paul_Manners
Wonkhe_Paul_Manners

Paul Manners

Director

by David Kernohan
staff
15/06/18

Paul Manners is the Director of the National Coordinating Centre for Public Engagement.

Tags

  • Communications
  • Covid-19
  • public engagement
  • Research
Paul Manners

Paul Manners is the Director of the National Coordinating Centre for Public Engagement.

Tags

  • Communications
  • Covid-19
  • public engagement
  • Research

Michael Gove’s infamous “we have had enough of experts” remark back in 2016 now rings very hollow.

There is great reassurance in seeing ministers flanked by experts at the daily press briefings as the government tries to manage the Covid-19 pandemic. The pandemic is creating a huge appetite for good scientific evidence and expertise.

Over the past few weeks, we have seen a range of researchers interviewed by the media, and many more are sharing their expertise with colleagues, family and friends. So what do we know about engaging with the public in a time of crisis? What advice should we offer researchers?

Think about your audience

A public health crisis on this scale has not been seen in our lifetimes, therefore many people are really frightened and anxious and this fear and worry inevitably affect how they “hear” what you are saying. Tuning into what those worries are and the questions people want answers to is a good place to start. Really listening to conversations – amongst friends, on Twitter, circulating on social media, and reflecting on how people are making sense of things will help you to work out how best to contribute.

Keep it simple

The situation is hugely complex with many unknowns and variables. The government has been careful to share the best scientific advice in bite-sized chunks, starting with the basics like hand hygiene (that feels like a long time ago now). In a situation like this it is important to make the knowledge actionable, enabling people to gain insights into what is happening, and take positive action to address the challenge.

Keep informed about the latest developments – the World Health Organisation (WHO) is a fantastic resource with the latest research logged here and regularly updated myth busters. UKRI’s Coronavirus: the science explained website lays out the evidence and facts about the virus and its control. Assume people are intelligent, but don’t assume they know the basics.

Choose your words carefully

The same words can mean different things to different people. Particularly high risk are words or phrases with technical meanings which people interpret using more colloquial frames of reference. Take the early debate over the extent to which the virus is “airborne” or not. As this article shows, scientists don’t agree what airborne actually means – so there is a real risk of misunderstanding. We need to think carefully about every word we use.

This extends to how we talk about the people involved too. The WHO provides excellent advice about how to avoid inadvertently stigmatising people who are being treated for Covid-19 by ill-chosen language (for instance talking about “cases” or “victims”).

Think about behaviour, not just facts

Whilst it can be tempting to believe that all people need is to be told the facts, and behaviour will follow, research and experience tells us that things are much more complicated than that. The so-called deficit model, where people are considered as empty vessels waiting to be filled with knowledge just doesn’t work.

If you want to change people’s behaviours you need to consider their emotional engagement with the topic in question, recognise that they have expertise and knowledge that informs their decision making which you are not privy to, and that they are strongly influenced by others. Ensure you are sharing simple, achievable actions to make it easy to get involved. Think about their peer networks, and the key influencers that they listen to, and ensure that you don’t assume what works for you works for anyone else.

Think of knowledge as something you create with people, rather than something you transmit

Educational theory can help you develop your communication. A really powerful idea is instructional scaffolding. Developed by Jerome Bruner in the late 1950s, it describes how experts can assist “apprentices” or novices by matching the level of support they offer to suit the cognitive potential of the learner. As the learner grasps the new knowledge, and internalises it, the scaffold falls away.

An example of a scaffold that has proved really powerful in engaging people with the science arose from the modelling contributed to by the team at Imperial College – leading to the worldwide focus on “flattening the curve”. The model vividly dramatised the underpinning dynamics of the public health catastrophe we were facing, with the speed of spread mapped against the capacity of health services. The visual and conceptual logic was obvious – and the ‘call to action’ incontrovertible.

Scaffolds like this make sense intellectually, can be easily visualised, verbalised and shared, and translate into collective action.

Show solidarity

Solidarity and global cooperation are needed to prevent further transmission and alleviate the concerns of communities. We need to recognise our role as scientists and as citizens, and show humanity and humility in our communications, perhaps by sharing sympathetic narratives, or stories that humanise the experiences of individuals or groups affected by Covid-19. And we need to communicate our support and encouragement for those who are on the frontlines of response to this outbreak (health care workers, volunteers, and community leaders)

Remember that every conversation counts. Some experts are commanding huge audiences through the media. Others are working much more locally, perhaps supporting local teachers with guidance on how to talk to their students about the virus. Don’t underestimate the value of those smaller, day-to-day conversations with family, friends and social networks.

Don’t over promise

While the temptation is to suggest science can provide the answers, there is a real risk of over-promising, and of losing public trust. A core principle of science is uncertainty. It is important to acknowledge how much is still unknowable about the pandemic, and that the science itself will change and perhaps lead to different answers as the situation develops. We need to talk about the process of science, to emphasise that we don’t have all the answers, but are cooperating globally to develop our understanding, on a day by day basis.

Listen as hard as you can

Above all, we need to listen. Seek advice on how to communicate – from colleagues, public engagement professionals, from agencies like the WHO and the Science Media Centre. Resist the temptation to always slip into “expert” mode and to offer answers and solutions. As important is to tune into how people are making sense of the pandemic and of the multiple sources of information around them. The better we understand this, the better we will be able to explain, and build scaffolds that are meaningful and practical.

Given our current pandemic, experts are more needed than ever before. But expert knowledge is not enough on its own. Our skills in engagement play a crucial role in ensuring our contribution is as meaningful, trustworthy and ethical as possible – and that we are maximising the value of research during an unprecedented collective crisis.

Share

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • icon-comments 2
  • icon-share

Share

  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)

post list Latest articles

shutterstock_2126740931
Image: Shutterstock

Academic fieldwork is a context where harassment and sexual misconduct can thrive

by Dani Bradford
Comment
12/08/22
048 south wales on cork
Image: Hugh Jones

Higher Education Postcard – University of South Wales

by Hugh Jones
Comment
12/08/22
Wonkhe-Caravans-Cars
Image: Shutterstock

Universities should offer campus stopping places

by Christopher Cunningham
Comment
11/08/22
Wonkhe-Colson-Whitehead
Image: Shutterstock (Colson Whitehead in Frankfurt, 2019)

Colson Whitehead’s The Underground Railroad, in context at Essex

by David Kernohan
Comment
10/08/22
Wonkhe-parking-FPN
Image: Shutterstock

Fixed penalty notice: The Wonkhe University Car Parking League Table 2023

by David Kernohan
Stacks
10/08/22
shutterstock_1081946663
Image: Shutterstock

Is OfS interested in extracurricular activity or not?

by Jim Dickinson
Comment
9/08/22
wonkhe-nurses
Image: Shutterstock

How to prevent a nursing student retention crisis

by Rachel Maxwell
Comment
8/08/22
Wonkhe-ABCs
Image: Shutterstock

Easy as one, two, three?

by David Kernohan
Data
8/08/22
Wonkhe-Downing-Street
Image: Shutterstock

What are Conservative leadership candidates saying about higher education?

by David Kernohan
Policy Watch
7/08/22
Wonkhe-Slice-Of-Cheesecake
Image: Shutterstock

Who’s getting more QR funding in England next year?

by James Coe
Policy Watch
5/08/22

2 responses to “Communicating research during Covid-19”

  1. Jan Green says:
    May 13 2020 at 12:16 pm

    A timely reminder – I’ve used the idea of a prop previously – scaffolding can be dismantled more gradually!

    Reply
  2. Anne adams says:
    May 19 2020 at 1:00 am

    All good points but I’d add in the importance of collecting and analysing local experiences to help understand behaviours in relation to national evidence bases. See observer article https://t.co/g7EjEpYPmj

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Related articles

Wonkhe-Covid-New-Freshers
Image: Shutterstock

Arts and humanities in times of crisis

by Karen Gray
Analysis
4/08/22
contrarian-apple-wonkhe
contrarian-apple-wonkhe

We should give ARIA a chance

by James Coe
Comment
3/08/22
00029630
Image: IKON

Professional services staff working through pandemia

by Richard Watermeyer
Comment
2/08/22
Wonkhe-lots-of-board-papers
Image: Shutterstock

What is research bureaucracy for? The Tickell review reports

by James Coe
Policy Watch
28/07/22
Wonkhe microscope
Image: Shutterstock

What’s in the government’s independent review of UKRI?

by James Coe
Policy Watch
20/07/22
shutterstock_1996292864
Image: Shutterstock

Why the next PM should focus on productivity

by Anton Muscatelli
Comment
20/07/22
shutterstock_1081663553
Image: Shutterstock

Educators and academics are key in unlocking technical talent

by John Holman
Comment
12/07/22
00017122
Image: IKON

Some students were entitled to a Covid refund after all

by Jim Dickinson
Analysis
2/07/22

Copyright © 2022 Wonkhe Ltd.

Company Number: 08784934

Wonkhe Ltd, Lower Third Floor Evelyn Suite, Quantum House,

22-24 Red Lion Court, London, United Kingdom, EC4A 3EB

  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Moderation policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Wonkhe Mondays

By submitting you agree to our terms and conditions

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.